head to head · open source
jaeger vs future-agi
jaeger has 23,368 GitHub stars, 3,222 forks, 547 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. future-agi has 2,245 stars, 707 forks, 889 open issues and last shipped yesterday. jaeger leads on adoption by 941% (23,368 vs 2,245 stars). jaeger is written in Go under Apache-2.0; future-agi is written in Python under Apache-2.0. jaeger has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, future-agi 31%. future-agi was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| jaeger | future-agi | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 23K | ★ 2.2K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Go | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-03 | 2026-11-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.2K | ⑂ 707 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick jaeger if
- You weight community size — 23K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick future-agi if
- You want the future-agi feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and future-agi fits your workflow better
About jaeger
[![Slack chat][slack img]]( get in touch) [![Unit Tests][ci img]][ci] [![Coverage Status][cov img]][cov] [![Project+Community stats][community badge]][community stats] [![FOSSA Status][fossa img]][fossa] [![OpenSSF Scorecard][openssf img]][openssf] [![OpenSSF Best Practices][openssf bp img]][openssf bp] [![CLOMonitor][clomonitor img]][clomonitor] [![Artifact Hub][artifacthub img]][artifacthub] Jaeger a Distributed Tracing System 💥💥💥 Jaeger v2 is out! Read the blog post and try it out. Quick Start Get Jaeger running in seconds with Docker: For production deployments and more options, see the Getting Started…
read the full jaeger overview →
About future-agi
⚠️ Nightly release for early testing. Expect rough edges. Stable version coming out soon — please open an issue if you hit anything. AI Agents hallucinate. Fix it faster. The open source platform for shipping self improving AI agents. Evaluations, tracing, simulations, guardrails, gateway, optimization. Everything runs on one platform and one feedback loop, from first prototype to live deployment. Try Cloud (Free) · Self Host · Docs · Blog · Discord · Discussions Why Future AGI? Most AI agents fail in production, and teams end up stitching together evals, observability, and guardrails that never close the loop…
read the full future-agi overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is jaeger or future-agi more popular?
jaeger has 23,368 GitHub stars and future-agi has 2,245. jaeger has the larger community by that measure.
Are jaeger and future-agi free?
Both are open source. jaeger is licensed under Apache-2.0 and future-agi under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between jaeger and future-agi?
jaeger is written in Go and future-agi in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, jaeger or future-agi?
Choose jaeger if you want the larger community (23,368 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose future-agi if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.