head to head · open source

Qdrant vs ioredis

Qdrant has 34,638 GitHub stars, 2,680 forks, 704 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ioredis has 15,339 stars, 1,251 forks, 202 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Qdrant leads on adoption by 126% (34,638 vs 15,339 stars). Qdrant is written in Rust under Apache-2.0; ioredis is written in TypeScript under MIT. Qdrant has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, ioredis 8%. Qdrant was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Qdrant ★ 35K ioredis ★ 15K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Qdrant ioredis
GitHub stars ★ 35K ★ 15K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Rust TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 2.7K ⑂ 1.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Qdrant if

  • You weight community size — 35K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Qdrant profile →

pick ioredis if

  • You want the ioredis feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and ioredis fits your workflow better

full ioredis profile →

About Qdrant

Qdrant is a vector similarity search engine and database built in Rust, designed for production use in AI applications. It stores, manages, and retrieves high dimensional vectors alongside associated metadata (payloads), supporting fast nearest neighbor search with filtering. It solves the problem of efficiently performing semantic or neural based matching at scale—such as finding similar images, recommending content, or powering retrieval augmented generation (RAG)—by replacing slow or inflexible brute force or index based approaches with a purpose built engine optimized for vector operations.…

read the full Qdrant overview →

About ioredis

ioredis is a robust, performance focused and full featured Redis client for Node.js, written entirely in TypeScript and released under the MIT licence, intended for Node.js developers and platform teams that need their applications to talk to Redis reliably.

read the full ioredis overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

Qdrant vs mall Qdrant vs Prometheus Qdrant vs NocoDB Qdrant vs etcd Qdrant vs DBeaver Qdrant vs orm Qdrant vs Milvus Qdrant vs TiDB Qdrant vs drawDB Qdrant vs typeorm Qdrant vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager Qdrant vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is Qdrant or ioredis more popular?

Qdrant has 34,638 GitHub stars and ioredis has 15,339. Qdrant has the larger community by that measure.

Are Qdrant and ioredis free?

Both are open source. Qdrant is licensed under Apache-2.0 and ioredis under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Qdrant and ioredis?

Qdrant is written in Rust and ioredis in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Qdrant or ioredis?

Choose Qdrant if you want the larger community (34,638 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose ioredis if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.