head to head · open source

PocketBase vs lapce

PocketBase has 61,103 GitHub stars, 3,694 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. lapce has 38,860 stars, 1,333 forks, 901 open issues and last shipped today. PocketBase leads on adoption by 57% (61,103 vs 38,860 stars). PocketBase is written in Go under MIT; lapce is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. PocketBase has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, lapce 3%. lapce was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

PocketBase ★ 61K lapce ★ 39K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

PocketBase lapce
GitHub stars ★ 61K ★ 39K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Go Rust
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 3.7K ⑂ 1.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick PocketBase if

  • You weight community size — 61K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full PocketBase profile →

pick lapce if

  • You want the lapce feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and lapce fits your workflow better

full lapce profile →

About PocketBase

PocketBase is an open source backend framework written in Go that bundles a SQLite database, authentication, file storage, admin dashboard, and REST API into a single executable file. It lives in the Go ecosystem and targets developers who want a lightweight, self contained backend without managing separate services like PostgreSQL, Redis, or a separate auth server.

read the full PocketBase overview →

About lapce

Lapce is an Apache 2.0 licensed, native graphical code editor written in pure Rust for developers who want fast text editing, built in language intelligence, Vim style modal editing, and remote development support inside one application rather than assembled from a base editor plus a stack of extensions.

read the full lapce overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

PocketBase vs ECC PocketBase vs react PocketBase vs Langflow PocketBase vs Supabase PocketBase vs puppeteer PocketBase vs archify PocketBase vs i-have-adhd PocketBase vs codebase-memory-mcp PocketBase vs ToolJet PocketBase vs AppSmith PocketBase vs it-tools PocketBase vs herdr

Frequently asked questions

Is PocketBase or lapce more popular?

PocketBase has 61,103 GitHub stars and lapce has 38,860. PocketBase has the larger community by that measure.

Are PocketBase and lapce free?

Both are open source. PocketBase is licensed under MIT and lapce under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between PocketBase and lapce?

PocketBase is written in Go and lapce in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, PocketBase or lapce?

Choose PocketBase if you want the larger community (61,103 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose lapce if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.