head to head · open source
Hoppscotch vs run-aspnetcore-microservices
Hoppscotch has 80,724 GitHub stars, 6,225 forks, 820 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. run-aspnetcore-microservices has 3,272 stars, 1,736 forks, 43 open issues and last shipped 8 months ago. Hoppscotch leads on adoption by 2,367% (80,724 vs 3,272 stars). Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript under MIT; run-aspnetcore-microservices is written in C# under MIT. Hoppscotch has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, run-aspnetcore-microservices 53%. Hoppscotch was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Hoppscotch | run-aspnetcore-microservices | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 81K | ★ 3.3K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | C# |
| Last push | 2026-10-31 | 2026-03-09 |
| Forks | ⑂ 6.2K | ⑂ 1.7K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Hoppscotch if
- You weight community size — 81K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick run-aspnetcore-microservices if
- You want the run-aspnetcore-microservices feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches C#
- You evaluated both and run-aspnetcore-microservices fits your workflow better
About Hoppscotch
Hoppscotch Open Source API Development Ecosystem Built with ❤︎ by contributors We highly recommend you take a look at the Hoppscotch Documentation to learn more about the app. Support Features ❤️ Lightweight: Crafted with minimalistic UI design. ⚡️ Fast: Send requests and get responses in real time. 🗄️ HTTP Methods: Request methods define the type of action you are requesting to be performed. GET Requests retrieve resource information POST The server creates a new entry in a database PUT Updates an existing resource PATCH Very similar to PUT but makes a partial update on a resource DELETE Deletes resource or…
read the full Hoppscotch overview →
About run-aspnetcore-microservices
UDEMY COURSE WITH DISCOUNTED Step by Step Development of this Repository See the overall picture of implementations on microservices with .net tools on real world e commerce microservices project; There is a couple of microservices which implemented e commerce modules over Catalog, Basket, Discount and Ordering microservices with NoSQL (DocumentDb, Redis) and Relational databases (PostgreSQL, Sql Server) with communicating over RabbitMQ Event Driven Communication and using Yarp API Gateway . Check Explanation of this Repository on Medium .NET 8 Microservices: DDD, CQRS, Vertical/Clean Architecture and Event…
read the full run-aspnetcore-microservices overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Hoppscotch or run-aspnetcore-microservices more popular?
Hoppscotch has 80,724 GitHub stars and run-aspnetcore-microservices has 3,272. Hoppscotch has the larger community by that measure.
Are Hoppscotch and run-aspnetcore-microservices free?
Both are open source. Hoppscotch is licensed under MIT and run-aspnetcore-microservices under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Hoppscotch and run-aspnetcore-microservices?
Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript and run-aspnetcore-microservices in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Hoppscotch or run-aspnetcore-microservices?
Choose Hoppscotch if you want the larger community (80,724 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose run-aspnetcore-microservices if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.