head to head · open source

hertzbeat vs open-multi-agent

hertzbeat has 7,398 GitHub stars, 1,330 forks, 313 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. open-multi-agent has 6,943 stars, 2,433 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. hertzbeat leads on adoption by 7% (7,398 vs 6,943 stars). hertzbeat is written in Java under Apache-2.0; open-multi-agent is written in TypeScript under MIT. hertzbeat has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, open-multi-agent 35%. open-multi-agent was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

hertzbeat ★ 7.4K open-multi-agent ★ 6.9K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

hertzbeat open-multi-agent
GitHub stars ★ 7.4K ★ 6.9K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Java TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 1.3K ⑂ 2.4K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick hertzbeat if

  • You weight community size — 7.4K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full hertzbeat profile →

pick open-multi-agent if

  • You want the open-multi-agent feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and open-multi-agent fits your workflow better

full open-multi-agent profile →

About hertzbeat

Apache HertzBeat is an AI powered, next generation open source real time observability system written in Java under the Apache 2.0 licence, built for teams that need unified metrics and logs collection, centralized alerting distribution, and intelligent management and analysis without deploying an agent on every monitored host.

read the full hertzbeat overview →

About open-multi-agent

OMA (Open Multi Agent) is a self hosted TypeScript agent runtime for teams that need consequential agent actions to wait for durable, tamper evident approvals and every run to leave a record that can be verified offline, byte for byte.

read the full open-multi-agent overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

hertzbeat vs Uptime Kuma hertzbeat vs worldmonitor hertzbeat vs NetData hertzbeat vs Grafana hertzbeat vs huginn hertzbeat vs Sentry hertzbeat vs SigNoz hertzbeat vs Grafana Loki hertzbeat vs beszel hertzbeat vs cilium hertzbeat vs Apache SkyWalking hertzbeat vs jaeger

Frequently asked questions

Is hertzbeat or open-multi-agent more popular?

hertzbeat has 7,398 GitHub stars and open-multi-agent has 6,943. hertzbeat has the larger community by that measure.

Are hertzbeat and open-multi-agent free?

Both are open source. hertzbeat is licensed under Apache-2.0 and open-multi-agent under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between hertzbeat and open-multi-agent?

hertzbeat is written in Java and open-multi-agent in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, hertzbeat or open-multi-agent?

Choose hertzbeat if you want the larger community (7,398 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose open-multi-agent if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.