head to head · open source

halo vs Umbraco-CMS

halo has 39,797 GitHub stars, 10,329 forks, 112 open issues and last shipped today. Umbraco-CMS has 5,251 stars, 2,922 forks, 525 open issues and last shipped yesterday. halo leads on adoption by 658% (39,797 vs 5,251 stars). halo is written in Java under GPL-3.0; Umbraco-CMS is written in C# under MIT. halo has attracted 26% as many forks as stars, Umbraco-CMS 56%. halo was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (cms), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

halo ★ 40K Umbraco-CMS ★ 5.3K category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

halo Umbraco-CMS
GitHub stars ★ 40K ★ 5.3K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Java C#
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 10K ⑂ 2.9K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick halo if

  • You weight community size — 40K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full halo profile →

pick Umbraco-CMS if

  • You want the Umbraco-CMS feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and Umbraco-CMS fits your workflow better

full Umbraco-CMS profile →

About halo

Halo is an open source, Java based website building tool licensed under GPL 3.0 that lets individuals and teams publish and run a blog, knowledge base, corporate website, or online store from infrastructure they control.

read the full halo overview →

About Umbraco-CMS

Umbraco CMS is a free and open source .NET content management system, released under the MIT licence, for .NET developers and editorial teams who need to build and operate content managed websites on infrastructure they control.

read the full Umbraco-CMS overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

hugo vs halo strapi vs halo hugo vs strapi hugo vs payload hugo vs filament strapi vs payload hugo vs wagtail hugo vs decap-cms next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki

More Content Management Systems (CMS) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Content Management Systems (CMS) field.

halo vs hugo halo vs Strapi halo vs Payload halo vs filament halo vs wagtail halo vs decap-cms halo vs TinaCMS halo vs frappe halo vs Instatic halo vs OrchardCore halo vs Publii halo vs sanity

Frequently asked questions

Is halo or Umbraco-CMS more popular?

halo has 39,797 GitHub stars and Umbraco-CMS has 5,251. halo has the larger community by that measure.

Are halo and Umbraco-CMS free?

Both are open source. halo is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Umbraco-CMS under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between halo and Umbraco-CMS?

halo is written in Java and Umbraco-CMS in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, halo or Umbraco-CMS?

Choose halo if you want the larger community (39,797 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Umbraco-CMS if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.