head to head · open source

halo vs OrchardCore

halo has 39,787 GitHub stars, 10,329 forks, 112 open issues and last shipped yesterday. OrchardCore has 8,184 stars, 2,598 forks, 854 open issues and last shipped yesterday. halo leads on adoption by 386% (39,787 vs 8,184 stars). halo is written in Java under GPL-3.0; OrchardCore is written in C# under BSD-3-Clause. halo has attracted 26% as many forks as stars, OrchardCore 32%. OrchardCore was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (cms), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

halo ★ 40K OrchardCore ★ 8.2K category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

halo OrchardCore
GitHub stars ★ 40K ★ 8.2K
License GPL-3.0 BSD-3-Clause
Written in Java C#
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 10K ⑂ 2.6K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick halo if

  • You weight community size — 40K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full halo profile →

pick OrchardCore if

  • You want the OrchardCore feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and OrchardCore fits your workflow better

full OrchardCore profile →

About halo

Halo is an open source, Java based website building tool licensed under GPL 3.0 that lets individuals and teams publish and run a blog, knowledge base, corporate website, or online store from infrastructure they control.

read the full halo overview →

About OrchardCore

Orchard Core is an open source, modular, multi tenant application framework and content management system built on ASP.NET Core, for .NET teams that want to build or self host modular web applications and content driven sites under the BSD 3 Clause licence.

read the full OrchardCore overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

hugo vs halo strapi vs halo hugo vs strapi hugo vs payload hugo vs filament strapi vs payload hugo vs wagtail hugo vs decap-cms next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki

More Content Management Systems (CMS) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Content Management Systems (CMS) field.

halo vs hugo halo vs Strapi halo vs Payload halo vs filament halo vs wagtail halo vs decap-cms halo vs TinaCMS halo vs frappe halo vs Instatic halo vs Publii halo vs sanity halo vs luban-h5

Frequently asked questions

Is halo or OrchardCore more popular?

halo has 39,787 GitHub stars and OrchardCore has 8,184. halo has the larger community by that measure.

Are halo and OrchardCore free?

Both are open source. halo is licensed under GPL-3.0 and OrchardCore under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between halo and OrchardCore?

halo is written in Java and OrchardCore in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, halo or OrchardCore?

Choose halo if you want the larger community (39,787 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose OrchardCore if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.