head to head · open source

halo vs TinaCMS

halo has 39,787 GitHub stars, 10,329 forks, 112 open issues and last shipped yesterday. TinaCMS has 13,799 stars, 755 forks, 444 open issues and last shipped yesterday. halo leads on adoption by 188% (39,787 vs 13,799 stars). halo is written in Java under GPL-3.0; TinaCMS is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. halo has attracted 26% as many forks as stars, TinaCMS 5%. halo was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (cms, content-management-system), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

halo ★ 40K TinaCMS ★ 14K category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

halo TinaCMS
GitHub stars ★ 40K ★ 14K
License GPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Java TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 10K ⑂ 755
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick halo if

  • You weight community size — 40K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full halo profile →

pick TinaCMS if

  • You want the TinaCMS feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and TinaCMS fits your workflow better

full TinaCMS profile →

About halo

Halo is an open source, Java based website building tool licensed under GPL 3.0 that lets individuals and teams publish and run a blog, knowledge base, corporate website, or online store from infrastructure they control.

read the full halo overview →

About TinaCMS

TinaCMS is an open source headless content management system for Git based content stored in a user's own GitHub repository. It lives in the TypeScript, React, and Next.js ecosystem and is categorized under Content & Publishing / Content Management Systems. It supports Markdown, MDX, JSON, YAML, and other content formats, with visual editing as a central feature.

read the full TinaCMS overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

hugo vs halo strapi vs halo hugo vs strapi hugo vs payload hugo vs filament strapi vs payload hugo vs wagtail hugo vs decap-cms next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki

More Content Management Systems (CMS) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Content Management Systems (CMS) field.

halo vs hugo halo vs Strapi halo vs Payload halo vs filament halo vs wagtail halo vs decap-cms halo vs frappe halo vs Instatic halo vs OrchardCore halo vs Publii halo vs sanity halo vs luban-h5

Frequently asked questions

Is halo or TinaCMS more popular?

halo has 39,787 GitHub stars and TinaCMS has 13,799. halo has the larger community by that measure.

Are halo and TinaCMS free?

Both are open source. halo is licensed under GPL-3.0 and TinaCMS under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between halo and TinaCMS?

halo is written in Java and TinaCMS in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, halo or TinaCMS?

Choose halo if you want the larger community (39,787 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose TinaCMS if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.