head to head · open source
Grafana vs TokenTracker
Grafana has 77,638 GitHub stars, 14,905 forks, 3,326 open issues and last shipped yesterday. TokenTracker has 2,177 stars, 225 forks, 34 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Grafana leads on adoption by 3,466% (77,638 vs 2,177 stars). Grafana is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; TokenTracker is written in JavaScript under MIT. Grafana has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, TokenTracker 10%. Grafana was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (dashboard), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Grafana | TokenTracker | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 78K | ★ 2.2K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 15K | ⑂ 225 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Grafana if
- You weight community size — 78K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick TokenTracker if
- You want the TokenTracker feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and TokenTracker fits your workflow better
About Grafana
The open source platform for monitoring and observability Grafana allows you to query, visualize, alert on and understand your metrics no matter where they are stored. Create, explore, and share dashboards with your team and foster a data driven culture: Visualizations: Fast and flexible client side graphs with a multitude of options. Panel plugins offer many different ways to visualize metrics and logs. Dynamic Dashboards: Create dynamic & reusable dashboards with template variables that appear as dropdowns at the top of the dashboard. Explore Metrics: Explore your data through ad hoc queries and dynamic…
read the full Grafana overview →
About TokenTracker
Token Tracker English · 简体中文 · 日本語 · 한국어 · Deutsch Track every AI token — then bring your usage to life An accurate, local first token usage and cost dashboard for 39 AI coding tools — plus a desktop pet, 4 native widgets , and 15 achievement tracks . No cloud account, no API keys, no setup. 📊 See the token dashboard in action 🐾 A living desktop companion Codes, celebrates streaks, follows your cursor, and rests when you do. 🧩 Four native widgets Usage, activity heatmap, top models, and rate limits at a glance. 🏆 Unlock achievements from the way you actually code. 🎬 Meet TokenTracker ⭐ If TokenTracker saves…
read the full TokenTracker overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Grafana or TokenTracker more popular?
Grafana has 77,638 GitHub stars and TokenTracker has 2,177. Grafana has the larger community by that measure.
Are Grafana and TokenTracker free?
Both are open source. Grafana is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and TokenTracker under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Grafana and TokenTracker?
Grafana is written in TypeScript and TokenTracker in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Grafana or TokenTracker?
Choose Grafana if you want the larger community (77,638 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose TokenTracker if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.