head to head · open source
Grafana vs tapir
Grafana has 76,792 GitHub stars, 14,752 forks, 3,326 open issues and last shipped yesterday. tapir has 1,473 stars, 468 forks, 173 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Grafana leads on adoption by 5,113% (76,792 vs 1,473 stars). Grafana is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; tapir is written in Scala under Apache-2.0. Grafana has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, tapir 32%. Grafana was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 13541 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Grafana | tapir | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 77K | ★ 1.5K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Scala |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 15K | ⑂ 468 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Grafana if
- You weight community size — 77K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick tapir if
- You want the tapir feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Scala
- You evaluated both and tapir fits your workflow better
About Grafana
Grafana is an open source observability platform for visualizing metrics, logs, and traces across diverse data sources. It runs in the infrastructure and operations ecosystem, designed for teams needing unified visibility into system behavior without vendor lock in. Built with TypeScript and Go, it provides a composable architecture that integrates with existing toolchains.
read the full Grafana overview →
About tapir
Tapir is a Scala library that lets developers describe an HTTP API once in a type safe, declarative form and then expose that description as a server, consume it as a client, and generate OpenAPI, AsyncAPI, and JSON Schema documentation from it, and it is aimed at Scala teams building HTTP services that want their API documentation to stay in step with their code.
read the full tapir overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Grafana or tapir more popular?
Grafana has 76,792 GitHub stars and tapir has 1,473. Grafana has the larger community by that measure.
Are Grafana and tapir free?
Both are open source. Grafana is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and tapir under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Grafana and tapir?
Grafana is written in TypeScript and tapir in Scala. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Grafana or tapir?
Choose Grafana if you want the larger community (76,792 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose tapir if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.