head to head · open source
Grafana vs Statusnook
Grafana has 77,638 GitHub stars, 14,905 forks, 3,326 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Statusnook has 988 stars, 32 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped 2.0 years ago. Grafana leads on adoption by 7,758% (77,638 vs 988 stars). Grafana is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; Statusnook is written in Go under MIT. Grafana has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, Statusnook 3%. Grafana was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (go, monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Grafana | Statusnook | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 78K | ★ 988 |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2024-10-31 |
| Forks | ⑂ 15K | ⑂ 32 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Grafana if
- You weight community size — 78K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Statusnook if
- You want the Statusnook feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and Statusnook fits your workflow better
About Grafana
The open source platform for monitoring and observability Grafana allows you to query, visualize, alert on and understand your metrics no matter where they are stored. Create, explore, and share dashboards with your team and foster a data driven culture: Visualizations: Fast and flexible client side graphs with a multitude of options. Panel plugins offer many different ways to visualize metrics and logs. Dynamic Dashboards: Create dynamic & reusable dashboards with template variables that appear as dropdowns at the top of the dashboard. Explore Metrics: Explore your data through ad hoc queries and dynamic…
read the full Grafana overview →
About Statusnook
Effortlessly deploy a status page and start monitoring endpoints in minutes Deployment paths Standalone Quickly deploy Statusnook with managed TLS. Requires ports 80 and 443 Reverse proxy Deploy Statusnook behind Caddy, NGINX, etc. Docker CLI compose.yaml One click cloud templates Binaries amd64 and arm64 Linux binaries can be found on the Releases page. Configuration Statusnook has the following configuration options: Web UI based config Text based config (YAML) via the settings page, or on push via GitHub Learn more about configuration Gallery
read the full Statusnook overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Grafana or Statusnook more popular?
Grafana has 77,638 GitHub stars and Statusnook has 988. Grafana has the larger community by that measure.
Are Grafana and Statusnook free?
Both are open source. Grafana is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Statusnook under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Grafana and Statusnook?
Grafana is written in TypeScript and Statusnook in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Grafana or Statusnook?
Choose Grafana if you want the larger community (77,638 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Statusnook if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.