head to head · open source

Grafana vs Peekaping

Grafana has 77,638 GitHub stars, 14,905 forks, 3,326 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Peekaping has 1,210 stars, 87 forks, 92 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Grafana leads on adoption by 6,316% (77,638 vs 1,210 stars). Grafana is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; Peekaping is written in Go under MIT. Grafana has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, Peekaping 7%. Grafana was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Grafana ★ 78K Peekaping ★ 1.2K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Grafana Peekaping
GitHub stars ★ 78K ★ 1.2K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-10-31
Forks ⑂ 15K ⑂ 87
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Grafana if

  • You weight community size — 78K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Grafana profile →

pick Peekaping if

  • You want the Peekaping feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and Peekaping fits your workflow better

full Peekaping profile →

About Grafana

The open source platform for monitoring and observability Grafana allows you to query, visualize, alert on and understand your metrics no matter where they are stored. Create, explore, and share dashboards with your team and foster a data driven culture: Visualizations: Fast and flexible client side graphs with a multitude of options. Panel plugins offer many different ways to visualize metrics and logs. Dynamic Dashboards: Create dynamic & reusable dashboards with template variables that appear as dropdowns at the top of the dashboard. Explore Metrics: Explore your data through ad hoc queries and dynamic…

read the full Grafana overview →

About Peekaping

Peekaping the best uptime kuma alternative A modern, self hosted uptime monitoring solution Peekaping is a uptime monitoring system built with Golang and React. You can monitor your websites, API and many more leveraging beautiful status pages, alert notifications. 🔗 Website peekaping.com 🔗 Live Demo demo.peekaping.com 🔗 Documentation docs.peekaping.com 🔗 Community terraform provider registry.terraform.io/providers/tafaust/peekaping Why Peekaping Is the Optimal Alternative to Uptime Kuma Peekaping is a modern uptime monitoring solution designed with the requirements of professional DevOps teams in mind…

read the full Peekaping overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana or Peekaping more popular?

Grafana has 77,638 GitHub stars and Peekaping has 1,210. Grafana has the larger community by that measure.

Are Grafana and Peekaping free?

Both are open source. Grafana is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Peekaping under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Grafana and Peekaping?

Grafana is written in TypeScript and Peekaping in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Grafana or Peekaping?

Choose Grafana if you want the larger community (77,638 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Peekaping if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.