head to head · open source

Grafana vs parseable

Grafana has 76,792 GitHub stars, 14,752 forks, 3,326 open issues and last shipped today. parseable has 2,458 stars, 172 forks, 20 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Grafana leads on adoption by 3,024% (76,792 vs 2,458 stars). Grafana is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; parseable is written in Rust under AGPL-3.0. Grafana has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, parseable 7%. Grafana was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (alerting, metrics), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Grafana ★ 77K parseable ★ 2.5K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Grafana parseable
GitHub stars ★ 77K ★ 2.5K
License AGPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Rust
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 15K ⑂ 172
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Grafana if

  • You weight community size — 77K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Grafana profile →

pick parseable if

  • You want the parseable feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and parseable fits your workflow better

full parseable profile →

About Grafana

Grafana is an open source observability platform for visualizing metrics, logs, and traces across diverse data sources. It runs in the infrastructure and operations ecosystem, designed for teams needing unified visibility into system behavior without vendor lock in. Built with TypeScript and Go, it provides a composable architecture that integrates with existing toolchains.

read the full Grafana overview →

About parseable

Introduction • Docs • Features • Benchmarks Parseable is an open source, columnar data lake platform purpose built for observability. Send logs, metrics & traces to Parseable via popular logging agents, OpenTelemetry, Kafka, eBPF or other integrations. Use native observability features like alerting, dashboards, anomaly detection, APM, PromQL & SQL all within a single binary. Why Parseable? Purpose built for observability and designed around proven data engineering patterns, Parseable gives you everything you need to make sense of your telemetry data, right out of the box. Some of the key highlight…

read the full parseable overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata worldmonitor vs netdata uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Grafana vs Uptime Kuma Grafana vs worldmonitor Grafana vs NetData Grafana vs huginn Grafana vs Sentry Grafana vs SigNoz Grafana vs Grafana Loki Grafana vs beszel Grafana vs cilium Grafana vs Apache SkyWalking Grafana vs jaeger Grafana vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana or parseable more popular?

Grafana has 76,792 GitHub stars and parseable has 2,458. Grafana has the larger community by that measure.

Are Grafana and parseable free?

Both are open source. Grafana is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and parseable under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Grafana and parseable?

Grafana is written in TypeScript and parseable in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Grafana or parseable?

Choose Grafana if you want the larger community (76,792 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose parseable if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.