head to head · open source
Grafana vs openwolf
Grafana has 76,792 GitHub stars, 14,752 forks, 3,326 open issues and last shipped today. openwolf has 2,342 stars, 209 forks, 56 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Grafana leads on adoption by 3,179% (76,792 vs 2,342 stars). Grafana is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; openwolf is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. Grafana has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, openwolf 9%. Grafana was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Grafana | openwolf | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 77K | ★ 2.3K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-15 |
| Forks | ⑂ 15K | ⑂ 209 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Grafana if
- You weight community size — 77K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick openwolf if
- You want the openwolf feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and openwolf fits your workflow better
About Grafana
Grafana is an open source observability platform for visualizing metrics, logs, and traces across diverse data sources. It runs in the infrastructure and operations ecosystem, designed for teams needing unified visibility into system behavior without vendor lock in. Built with TypeScript and Go, it provides a composable architecture that integrates with existing toolchains.
read the full Grafana overview →
About openwolf
OpenWolf Keep project memory across your coding agents. OpenWolf keeps task context, project maps and known fixes in one local folder. Help Claude Code, Codex and OpenCode continue saved work and find relevant code. Reduce repeated context and review recorded token usage by agent and model. Memory and indexing run locally without extra model calls. Hooks: Claude Code, Codex CLI · Plugin: OpenCode · Compatible hooks: Grok Build · Context only: Cursor, Gemini CLI, Antigravity What it does A coding session produces useful context: the task objective, files changed, failed tests and the next action. That information …
read the full openwolf overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Grafana or openwolf more popular?
Grafana has 76,792 GitHub stars and openwolf has 2,342. Grafana has the larger community by that measure.
Are Grafana and openwolf free?
Both are open source. Grafana is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and openwolf under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Grafana and openwolf?
Grafana is written in TypeScript and openwolf in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Grafana or openwolf?
Choose Grafana if you want the larger community (76,792 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose openwolf if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.