head to head · open source

Grafana vs openwolf

Grafana has 77,638 GitHub stars, 14,905 forks, 3,326 open issues and last shipped yesterday. openwolf has 2,401 stars, 212 forks, 56 open issues and last shipped 15 days ago. Grafana leads on adoption by 3,134% (77,638 vs 2,401 stars). Grafana is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; openwolf is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. Grafana has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, openwolf 9%. Grafana was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Grafana ★ 78K openwolf ★ 2.4K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Grafana openwolf
GitHub stars ★ 78K ★ 2.4K
License AGPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-10-19
Forks ⑂ 15K ⑂ 212
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Grafana if

  • You weight community size — 78K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Grafana profile →

pick openwolf if

  • You want the openwolf feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and openwolf fits your workflow better

full openwolf profile →

About Grafana

The open source platform for monitoring and observability Grafana allows you to query, visualize, alert on and understand your metrics no matter where they are stored. Create, explore, and share dashboards with your team and foster a data driven culture: Visualizations: Fast and flexible client side graphs with a multitude of options. Panel plugins offer many different ways to visualize metrics and logs. Dynamic Dashboards: Create dynamic & reusable dashboards with template variables that appear as dropdowns at the top of the dashboard. Explore Metrics: Explore your data through ad hoc queries and dynamic…

read the full Grafana overview →

About openwolf

OpenWolf Keep project memory across your coding agents. OpenWolf keeps task context, project maps and known fixes in one local folder. Help Claude Code, Codex and OpenCode continue saved work and find relevant code. Reduce repeated context and review recorded token usage by agent and model. Memory and indexing run locally without extra model calls. Hooks: Claude Code, Codex CLI · Plugin: OpenCode · Compatible hooks: Grok Build · Context only: Cursor, Gemini CLI, Antigravity What it does A coding session produces useful context: the task objective, files changed, failed tests and the next action. That information…

read the full openwolf overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana or openwolf more popular?

Grafana has 77,638 GitHub stars and openwolf has 2,401. Grafana has the larger community by that measure.

Are Grafana and openwolf free?

Both are open source. Grafana is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and openwolf under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Grafana and openwolf?

Grafana is written in TypeScript and openwolf in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Grafana or openwolf?

Choose Grafana if you want the larger community (77,638 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose openwolf if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.