head to head · open source

Grafana vs logging-log4net

Grafana has 76,792 GitHub stars, 14,752 forks, 3,326 open issues and last shipped yesterday. logging-log4net has 934 stars, 333 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Grafana leads on adoption by 8,122% (76,792 vs 934 stars). Grafana is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; logging-log4net is written in C# under Apache-2.0. Grafana has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, logging-log4net 36%. Grafana was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Grafana ★ 77K logging-log4net ★ 934 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

Grafana logging-log4net
GitHub stars ★ 77K ★ 934
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript C#
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 15K ⑂ 333
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Grafana if

  • You weight community size — 77K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Grafana profile →

pick logging-log4net if

  • You want the logging-log4net feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and logging-log4net fits your workflow better

full logging-log4net profile →

About Grafana

Grafana is an open source observability platform for visualizing metrics, logs, and traces across diverse data sources. It runs in the infrastructure and operations ecosystem, designed for teams needing unified visibility into system behavior without vendor lock in. Built with TypeScript and Go, it provides a composable architecture that integrates with existing toolchains.

read the full Grafana overview →

About logging-log4net

Apache log4net is a versatile, feature rich logging API and backend for .NET, distributed as the NuGet package log4net and developed as a subproject of the Apache Logging Services project — a fit for .NET developers and platform teams that need a stable, Apache licensed logging library rather than a commercial or single vendor offering.

read the full logging-log4net overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata worldmonitor vs netdata uptime-kuma vs prometheus n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack llama-index vs haystack compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job langgraph vs haystack compose vs gitleaks trivy vs gitleaks supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Grafana vs Uptime Kuma Grafana vs worldmonitor Grafana vs NetData Grafana vs huginn Grafana vs Sentry Grafana vs SigNoz Grafana vs Grafana Loki Grafana vs beszel Grafana vs cilium Grafana vs Apache SkyWalking Grafana vs jaeger Grafana vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana or logging-log4net more popular?

Grafana has 76,792 GitHub stars and logging-log4net has 934. Grafana has the larger community by that measure.

Are Grafana and logging-log4net free?

Both are open source. Grafana is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and logging-log4net under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Grafana and logging-log4net?

Grafana is written in TypeScript and logging-log4net in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Grafana or logging-log4net?

Choose Grafana if you want the larger community (76,792 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose logging-log4net if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.