head to head · open source

Grafana vs Gigapipe

Grafana has 76,791 GitHub stars, 14,749 forks, 3,326 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Gigapipe has 1,706 stars, 102 forks, 16 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Grafana leads on adoption by 4,401% (76,791 vs 1,706 stars). Grafana is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; Gigapipe is written in Go under AGPL-3.0. Grafana has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, Gigapipe 6%. Grafana was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (grafana, metrics, monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Grafana ★ 77K Gigapipe ★ 1.7K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Grafana Gigapipe
GitHub stars ★ 77K ★ 1.7K
License AGPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 15K ⑂ 102
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Grafana if

  • You weight community size — 77K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Grafana profile →

pick Gigapipe if

  • You want the Gigapipe feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and Gigapipe fits your workflow better

full Gigapipe profile →

About Grafana

Grafana is an open source observability platform for visualizing metrics, logs, and traces across diverse data sources. It runs in the infrastructure and operations ecosystem, designed for teams needing unified visibility into system behavior without vendor lock in. Built with TypeScript and Go, it provides a composable architecture that integrates with existing toolchains.

read the full Grafana overview →

About Gigapipe

Gigapipe is an open source observability warehouse written in Go under the AGPL 3.0 license. The project, formerly known as qryn, combines logs, metrics, traces, and profiling in one stack, and it presents itself as a lightweight, cloud native, drop in alternative to Grafana LGTMP.

read the full Gigapipe overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata worldmonitor vs netdata uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Grafana vs Uptime Kuma Grafana vs worldmonitor Grafana vs NetData Grafana vs huginn Grafana vs Sentry Grafana vs SigNoz Grafana vs Grafana Loki Grafana vs beszel Grafana vs cilium Grafana vs Apache SkyWalking Grafana vs jaeger Grafana vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana or Gigapipe more popular?

Grafana has 76,791 GitHub stars and Gigapipe has 1,706. Grafana has the larger community by that measure.

Are Grafana and Gigapipe free?

Both are open source. Grafana is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Gigapipe under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Grafana and Gigapipe?

Grafana is written in TypeScript and Gigapipe in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Grafana or Gigapipe?

Choose Grafana if you want the larger community (76,791 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Gigapipe if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.