head to head · open source

Grafana vs flogger

Grafana has 76,792 GitHub stars, 14,752 forks, 3,326 open issues and last shipped yesterday. flogger has 1,481 stars, 133 forks, 53 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. Grafana leads on adoption by 5,085% (76,792 vs 1,481 stars). Grafana is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; flogger is written in Java under Apache-2.0. Grafana has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, flogger 9%. Grafana was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Grafana ★ 77K flogger ★ 1.5K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

Grafana flogger
GitHub stars ★ 77K ★ 1.5K
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Java
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-12
Forks ⑂ 15K ⑂ 133
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Grafana if

  • You weight community size — 77K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Grafana profile →

pick flogger if

  • You want the flogger feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and flogger fits your workflow better

full flogger profile →

About Grafana

Grafana is an open source observability platform for visualizing metrics, logs, and traces across diverse data sources. It runs in the infrastructure and operations ecosystem, designed for teams needing unified visibility into system behavior without vendor lock in. Built with TypeScript and Go, it provides a composable architecture that integrates with existing toolchains.

read the full Grafana overview →

About flogger

Flogger is a fluent logging API for Java, published under the Apache 2.0 licence by Google, that replaces a wide field of competing Java logging APIs with one unified, self documenting interface.

read the full flogger overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata worldmonitor vs netdata uptime-kuma vs prometheus n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack llama-index vs haystack compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job langgraph vs haystack compose vs gitleaks trivy vs gitleaks supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Grafana vs Uptime Kuma Grafana vs worldmonitor Grafana vs NetData Grafana vs huginn Grafana vs Sentry Grafana vs SigNoz Grafana vs Grafana Loki Grafana vs beszel Grafana vs cilium Grafana vs Apache SkyWalking Grafana vs jaeger Grafana vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana or flogger more popular?

Grafana has 76,792 GitHub stars and flogger has 1,481. Grafana has the larger community by that measure.

Are Grafana and flogger free?

Both are open source. Grafana is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and flogger under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Grafana and flogger?

Grafana is written in TypeScript and flogger in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Grafana or flogger?

Choose Grafana if you want the larger community (76,792 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose flogger if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.