head to head · open source

Grafana vs file.d

Grafana has 76,792 GitHub stars, 14,752 forks, 3,326 open issues and last shipped today. file.d has 504 stars, 263 forks, 73 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Grafana leads on adoption by 15,137% (76,792 vs 504 stars). Grafana is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; file.d is written in Go under BSD-3-Clause. Grafana has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, file.d 52%. Grafana was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (elasticsearch, go), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Grafana ★ 77K file.d ★ 504 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Grafana file.d
GitHub stars ★ 77K ★ 504
License AGPL-3.0 BSD-3-Clause
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 15K ⑂ 263
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Grafana if

  • You weight community size — 77K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Grafana profile →

pick file.d if

  • You want the file.d feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and file.d fits your workflow better

full file.d profile →

About Grafana

Grafana is an open source observability platform for visualizing metrics, logs, and traces across diverse data sources. It runs in the infrastructure and operations ecosystem, designed for teams needing unified visibility into system behavior without vendor lock in. Built with TypeScript and Go, it provides a composable architecture that integrates with existing toolchains.

read the full Grafana overview →

About file.d

Overview file.d is a blazing fast tool for building data pipelines: read, process, and output events. Primarily developed to read from files, but also supports numerous input/action/output plugins. ⚠ Although we use it in production, it still isn't v1.0.0 . Please, test your pipelines carefully on dev/stage environments. Contributing file.d is an open source project and contributions are very welcome! Please make sure to read our contributing guide before creating an issue and opening a PR! Motivation Well, we already have several similar tools: vector, filebeat, logstash, fluend d, fluent bit, etc. Performance t…

read the full file.d overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata worldmonitor vs netdata uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Grafana vs Uptime Kuma Grafana vs worldmonitor Grafana vs NetData Grafana vs huginn Grafana vs Sentry Grafana vs SigNoz Grafana vs Grafana Loki Grafana vs beszel Grafana vs cilium Grafana vs Apache SkyWalking Grafana vs jaeger Grafana vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana or file.d more popular?

Grafana has 76,792 GitHub stars and file.d has 504. Grafana has the larger community by that measure.

Are Grafana and file.d free?

Both are open source. Grafana is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and file.d under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Grafana and file.d?

Grafana is written in TypeScript and file.d in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Grafana or file.d?

Choose Grafana if you want the larger community (76,792 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose file.d if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.