head to head · open source

Grafana vs defmt

Grafana has 76,792 GitHub stars, 14,752 forks, 3,326 open issues and last shipped yesterday. defmt has 1,228 stars, 132 forks, 117 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. Grafana leads on adoption by 6,153% (76,792 vs 1,228 stars). Grafana is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; defmt is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. Grafana has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, defmt 11%. Grafana was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Grafana ★ 77K defmt ★ 1.2K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

Grafana defmt
GitHub stars ★ 77K ★ 1.2K
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Rust
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-08
Forks ⑂ 15K ⑂ 132
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Grafana if

  • You weight community size — 77K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Grafana profile →

pick defmt if

  • You want the defmt feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and defmt fits your workflow better

full defmt profile →

About Grafana

Grafana is an open source observability platform for visualizing metrics, logs, and traces across diverse data sources. It runs in the infrastructure and operations ecosystem, designed for teams needing unified visibility into system behavior without vendor lock in. Built with TypeScript and Go, it provides a composable architecture that integrates with existing toolchains.

read the full Grafana overview →

About defmt

defmt is an efficient, deferred formatting logging framework for embedded systems written in Rust, aimed at firmware developers building for resource constrained devices such as microcontrollers.

read the full defmt overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata worldmonitor vs netdata uptime-kuma vs prometheus n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack llama-index vs haystack compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job langgraph vs haystack compose vs gitleaks trivy vs gitleaks supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Grafana vs Uptime Kuma Grafana vs worldmonitor Grafana vs NetData Grafana vs huginn Grafana vs Sentry Grafana vs SigNoz Grafana vs Grafana Loki Grafana vs beszel Grafana vs cilium Grafana vs Apache SkyWalking Grafana vs jaeger Grafana vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana or defmt more popular?

Grafana has 76,792 GitHub stars and defmt has 1,228. Grafana has the larger community by that measure.

Are Grafana and defmt free?

Both are open source. Grafana is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and defmt under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Grafana and defmt?

Grafana is written in TypeScript and defmt in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Grafana or defmt?

Choose Grafana if you want the larger community (76,792 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose defmt if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.