head to head · open source
Grafana vs clp
Grafana has 77,638 GitHub stars, 14,905 forks, 3,326 open issues and last shipped yesterday. clp has 1,091 stars, 95 forks, 493 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Grafana leads on adoption by 7,016% (77,638 vs 1,091 stars). Grafana is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; clp is written in C++ under Apache-2.0. Grafana has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, clp 9%. Grafana was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (analytics), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Grafana | clp | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 78K | ★ 1.1K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | C++ |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 15K | ⑂ 95 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Grafana if
- You weight community size — 78K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick clp if
- You want the clp feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You evaluated both and clp fits your workflow better
About Grafana
The open source platform for monitoring and observability Grafana allows you to query, visualize, alert on and understand your metrics no matter where they are stored. Create, explore, and share dashboards with your team and foster a data driven culture: Visualizations: Fast and flexible client side graphs with a multitude of options. Panel plugins offer many different ways to visualize metrics and logs. Dynamic Dashboards: Create dynamic & reusable dashboards with template variables that appear as dropdowns at the top of the dashboard. Explore Metrics: Explore your data through ad hoc queries and dynamic…
read the full Grafana overview →
About clp
[![Discord][badge discord]][clp community discord] [![Slack][badge slack]][clp community slack] [![CLP on Zulip][badge zulip]][yscope community zulip] YScope's Compressed Log Processor (CLP) compresses your logs, and allows you to search the compressed logs without decompression. CLP supports both JSON logs and unstructured (i.e., free text) logs. It also supports real time log compression within several logging libraries. CLP also includes purpose built web interfaces for searching and viewing the compressed logs. To learn more about it, read our [2021 paper][clp paper 21] about handling unstructured logs and…
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Grafana or clp more popular?
Grafana has 77,638 GitHub stars and clp has 1,091. Grafana has the larger community by that measure.
Are Grafana and clp free?
Both are open source. Grafana is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and clp under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Grafana and clp?
Grafana is written in TypeScript and clp in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Grafana or clp?
Choose Grafana if you want the larger community (77,638 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose clp if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.