head to head · open source

Grafana vs aya

Grafana has 76,792 GitHub stars, 14,752 forks, 3,326 open issues and last shipped today. aya has 4,811 stars, 477 forks, 201 open issues and last shipped today. Grafana leads on adoption by 1,496% (76,792 vs 4,811 stars). Grafana is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; aya is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. Grafana has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, aya 10%. Grafana was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Grafana ★ 77K aya ★ 4.8K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Grafana aya
GitHub stars ★ 77K ★ 4.8K
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Rust
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 15K ⑂ 477
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Grafana if

  • You weight community size — 77K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Grafana profile →

pick aya if

  • You want the aya feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and aya fits your workflow better

full aya profile →

About Grafana

Grafana is an open source observability platform for visualizing metrics, logs, and traces across diverse data sources. It runs in the infrastructure and operations ecosystem, designed for teams needing unified visibility into system behavior without vendor lock in. Built with TypeScript and Go, it provides a composable architecture that integrates with existing toolchains.

read the full Grafana overview →

About aya

Aya is an eBPF library for the Rust programming language, built with a focus on developer experience and operability, and it exists so that Rust developers can load, attach, and drive eBPF programs running inside the Linux kernel without depending on C toolchains or C eBPF frameworks.

read the full aya overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata worldmonitor vs netdata uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Grafana vs Uptime Kuma Grafana vs worldmonitor Grafana vs NetData Grafana vs huginn Grafana vs Sentry Grafana vs SigNoz Grafana vs Grafana Loki Grafana vs beszel Grafana vs cilium Grafana vs Apache SkyWalking Grafana vs jaeger Grafana vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana or aya more popular?

Grafana has 76,792 GitHub stars and aya has 4,811. Grafana has the larger community by that measure.

Are Grafana and aya free?

Both are open source. Grafana is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and aya under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Grafana and aya?

Grafana is written in TypeScript and aya in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Grafana or aya?

Choose Grafana if you want the larger community (76,792 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose aya if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.