head to head · open source

Grafana vs AutoKuma

Grafana has 77,638 GitHub stars, 14,905 forks, 3,326 open issues and last shipped yesterday. AutoKuma has 922 stars, 48 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. Grafana leads on adoption by 8,321% (77,638 vs 922 stars). Grafana is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; AutoKuma is written in Rust under MIT. Grafana has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, AutoKuma 5%. Grafana was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Grafana ★ 78K AutoKuma ★ 922 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Grafana AutoKuma
GitHub stars ★ 78K ★ 922
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript Rust
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-06-18
Forks ⑂ 15K ⑂ 48
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Grafana if

  • You weight community size — 78K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Grafana profile →

pick AutoKuma if

  • You want the AutoKuma feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and AutoKuma fits your workflow better

full AutoKuma profile →

About Grafana

The open source platform for monitoring and observability Grafana allows you to query, visualize, alert on and understand your metrics no matter where they are stored. Create, explore, and share dashboards with your team and foster a data driven culture: Visualizations: Fast and flexible client side graphs with a multitude of options. Panel plugins offer many different ways to visualize metrics and logs. Dynamic Dashboards: Create dynamic & reusable dashboards with template variables that appear as dropdowns at the top of the dashboard. Explore Metrics: Explore your data through ad hoc queries and dynamic…

read the full Grafana overview →

About AutoKuma

AutoKuma &nbsp&nbsp Kuma CLI &nbsp&nbsp Kuma Client &nbsp&nbsp Documentation &nbsp&nbsp Playground AutoKuma 🐻 AutoKuma is a utility that automates the creation of Uptime Kuma monitors based on Docker container labels. With AutoKuma, you can eliminate the need for manual monitor creation in the Uptime Kuma UI. Supported Sources These sources are supported on an as is basis as I'm currently not running any of them (they are basically looking for a maintainer, please get in contact if you'd like to adopt one or add support for another source). Quick Start 🚀 The fastest way to get going is with Docker Compose…

read the full AutoKuma overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana or AutoKuma more popular?

Grafana has 77,638 GitHub stars and AutoKuma has 922. Grafana has the larger community by that measure.

Are Grafana and AutoKuma free?

Both are open source. Grafana is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and AutoKuma under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Grafana and AutoKuma?

Grafana is written in TypeScript and AutoKuma in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Grafana or AutoKuma?

Choose Grafana if you want the larger community (77,638 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose AutoKuma if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.