head to head · open source
Grafana vs auto-cpufreq
Grafana has 77,638 GitHub stars, 14,905 forks, 3,326 open issues and last shipped yesterday. auto-cpufreq has 7,859 stars, 360 forks, 79 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. Grafana leads on adoption by 888% (77,638 vs 7,859 stars). Grafana is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; auto-cpufreq is written in Python under GPL-3.0. Grafana has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, auto-cpufreq 5%. Grafana was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (hacktoberfest), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Grafana | auto-cpufreq | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 78K | ★ 7.9K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-28 |
| Forks | ⑂ 15K | ⑂ 360 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Grafana if
- You weight community size — 78K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick auto-cpufreq if
- You want the auto-cpufreq feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and auto-cpufreq fits your workflow better
About Grafana
The open source platform for monitoring and observability Grafana allows you to query, visualize, alert on and understand your metrics no matter where they are stored. Create, explore, and share dashboards with your team and foster a data driven culture: Visualizations: Fast and flexible client side graphs with a multitude of options. Panel plugins offer many different ways to visualize metrics and logs. Dynamic Dashboards: Create dynamic & reusable dashboards with template variables that appear as dropdowns at the top of the dashboard. Explore Metrics: Explore your data through ad hoc queries and dynamic…
read the full Grafana overview →
About auto-cpufreq
auto cpufreq Automatic CPU speed & power optimizer for Linux. Actively monitors laptop battery state, CPU usage, CPU temperature, and system load, ultimately allowing you to improve battery life without making any compromises. For tl;dr folks: Youtube: From 10 day vacation project to 100k users: auto cpufreq v3 story Blog post: From 10 day vacation project to 100k users: auto cpufreq v3 story Youtube: auto cpufreq v2.0 release & demo of all available features and options Blog post: auto cpufreq v2.0 Youtube: auto cpufreq tool demo Blog post: auto cpufreq – Automatic CPU speed & power optimizer for Linux If…
read the full auto-cpufreq overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Grafana or auto-cpufreq more popular?
Grafana has 77,638 GitHub stars and auto-cpufreq has 7,859. Grafana has the larger community by that measure.
Are Grafana and auto-cpufreq free?
Both are open source. Grafana is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and auto-cpufreq under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Grafana and auto-cpufreq?
Grafana is written in TypeScript and auto-cpufreq in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Grafana or auto-cpufreq?
Choose Grafana if you want the larger community (77,638 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose auto-cpufreq if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.