head to head · open source

Grafana vs alloy

Grafana has 76,792 GitHub stars, 14,752 forks, 3,326 open issues and last shipped today. alloy has 3,547 stars, 709 forks, 1,237 open issues and last shipped today. Grafana leads on adoption by 2,065% (76,792 vs 3,547 stars). Grafana is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; alloy is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Grafana has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, alloy 20%. Grafana was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (grafana, monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Grafana ★ 77K alloy ★ 3.5K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Grafana alloy
GitHub stars ★ 77K ★ 3.5K
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 15K ⑂ 709
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Grafana if

  • You weight community size — 77K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Grafana profile →

pick alloy if

  • You want the alloy feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and alloy fits your workflow better

full alloy profile →

About Grafana

Grafana is an open source observability platform for visualizing metrics, logs, and traces across diverse data sources. It runs in the infrastructure and operations ecosystem, designed for teams needing unified visibility into system behavior without vendor lock in. Built with TypeScript and Go, it provides a composable architecture that integrates with existing toolchains.

read the full Grafana overview →

About alloy

Grafana Alloy is an open source OpenTelemetry Collector distribution with built in Prometheus pipelines and support for metrics, logs, traces, and profiles. What can Alloy do? Programmable pipelines : Use a rich [expression based syntax][syntax] for configuring powerful observability pipelines. OpenTelemetry Collector Distribution : Alloy is a [distribution][] of OpenTelemetry Collector and supports dozens of its components, alongside new components that make use of Alloy's programmable pipelines. Big tent : Alloy embraces Grafana's "big tent" philosophy, where Alloy can be used with other vendors or open source …

read the full alloy overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata worldmonitor vs netdata uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Grafana vs Uptime Kuma Grafana vs worldmonitor Grafana vs NetData Grafana vs huginn Grafana vs Sentry Grafana vs SigNoz Grafana vs Grafana Loki Grafana vs beszel Grafana vs cilium Grafana vs Apache SkyWalking Grafana vs jaeger Grafana vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana or alloy more popular?

Grafana has 76,792 GitHub stars and alloy has 3,547. Grafana has the larger community by that measure.

Are Grafana and alloy free?

Both are open source. Grafana is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and alloy under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Grafana and alloy?

Grafana is written in TypeScript and alloy in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Grafana or alloy?

Choose Grafana if you want the larger community (76,792 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose alloy if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.