head to head · open source
gpt-load vs agent-router
gpt-load has 7,199 GitHub stars, 798 forks, 21 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. agent-router has 2,341 stars, 449 forks, 300 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. gpt-load leads on adoption by 208% (7,199 vs 2,341 stars). gpt-load is written in Go under MIT; agent-router is written in Go under Apache-2.0. gpt-load has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, agent-router 19%. gpt-load was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (ai-gateway, api-gateway, llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| gpt-load | agent-router | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 7.2K | ★ 2.3K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Go | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-03 | 2026-10-29 |
| Forks | ⑂ 798 | ⑂ 449 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick gpt-load if
- You weight community size — 7.2K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick agent-router if
- You want the agent-router feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and agent-router fits your workflow better
About gpt-load
GPT Load A self hosted AI gateway for multi channel, multi credential setups API keys, subscription accounts, traffic scheduling, failure handling, request logs, and usage accounting — behind a single entry point. English · 中文 · 日本語 Official Website Sponsors Become a sponsor Sponsor details (collapsible) OfoxAI: Text, image, and video AI in one platform OfoxAI is a unified AI API platform bringing together text, image, and video models from multiple providers. With OpenAI compatible endpoints and native Anthropic and Gemini interfaces, developers can access models for AI applications, agents, and content…
read the full gpt-load overview →
About agent-router
The open source control plane for AI and agent traffic, powered by Envoy. An Agentic AI Foundation project. Formerly Envoy AI Gateway . Documentation · Quickstart · Blog · Release Notes · Talks Agent Router Agent Router gives application teams one consistent, OpenAI compatible API for every model and tool, from hosted providers to self hosted inference and MCP servers. Platform teams keep credentials, routing, quotas, failover, and usage attribution in one place, enforced by Envoy and Envoy Gateway. Agent Router controls. Envoy carries. Formerly Envoy AI Gateway Envoy AI Gateway is now Agent Router , an Agentic…
read the full agent-router overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is gpt-load or agent-router more popular?
gpt-load has 7,199 GitHub stars and agent-router has 2,341. gpt-load has the larger community by that measure.
Are gpt-load and agent-router free?
Both are open source. gpt-load is licensed under MIT and agent-router under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between gpt-load and agent-router?
gpt-load is written in Go and agent-router in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, gpt-load or agent-router?
Choose gpt-load if you want the larger community (7,199 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose agent-router if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.