head to head · open source

SafeLine vs gpt-load

SafeLine has 22,638 GitHub stars, 1,535 forks, 69 open issues and last shipped today. gpt-load has 6,865 stars, 759 forks, 21 open issues and last shipped today. SafeLine leads on adoption by 230% (22,638 vs 6,865 stars). SafeLine is written in Go under GPL-3.0; gpt-load is written in Go under MIT. SafeLine has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, gpt-load 11%. gpt-load was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (api-gateway), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

SafeLine ★ 23K gpt-load ★ 6.9K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

SafeLine gpt-load
GitHub stars ★ 23K ★ 6.9K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 1.5K ⑂ 759
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick SafeLine if

  • You weight community size — 23K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full SafeLine profile →

pick gpt-load if

  • You want the gpt-load feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and gpt-load fits your workflow better

full gpt-load profile →

About SafeLine

SafeLine is a self hosted web application firewall and reverse proxy, written in Go and licensed under GPL 3.0, that filters, monitors, and blocks malicious HTTP/S traffic before it reaches a web application — built for developers, AppSec engineers, and blue teams who want to run edge protection on their own infrastructure.

read the full SafeLine overview →

About gpt-load

GPT Load is a self hosted AI gateway written in Go and released under the MIT license. It gives applications a single entry point — one base URL and one AccessKey — for reaching many AI providers at once. Providers, accounts, credentials, models, and routing policy are configured in the bundled management UI rather than in application code.

read the full gpt-load overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

fastapi vs hoppscotch fastapi vs bruno fastapi vs insomnia fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs openapi-specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc hoppscotch vs bruno openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

SafeLine vs fastapi SafeLine vs Hoppscotch SafeLine vs Bruno SafeLine vs Insomnia SafeLine vs one-api SafeLine vs OpenAPI-Specification SafeLine vs openapi-generator SafeLine vs redoc SafeLine vs Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF SafeLine vs grpc-gateway SafeLine vs Yaak SafeLine vs hurl

Frequently asked questions

Is SafeLine or gpt-load more popular?

SafeLine has 22,638 GitHub stars and gpt-load has 6,865. SafeLine has the larger community by that measure.

Are SafeLine and gpt-load free?

Both are open source. SafeLine is licensed under GPL-3.0 and gpt-load under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between SafeLine and gpt-load?

SafeLine is written in Go and gpt-load in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, SafeLine or gpt-load?

Choose SafeLine if you want the larger community (22,638 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose gpt-load if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.