head to head · open source

goflylivechat vs rt

goflylivechat has 2,591 GitHub stars, 729 forks, 39 open issues and last shipped 1.1 years ago. rt has 1,162 stars, 298 forks, 82 open issues and last shipped yesterday. goflylivechat leads on adoption by 123% (2,591 vs 1,162 stars). goflylivechat is written in HTML under Apache-2.0; rt is written in Perl under GPL-2.0. goflylivechat has attracted 28% as many forks as stars, rt 26%. rt was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (customer-support), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

goflylivechat ★ 2.6K rt ★ 1.2K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

goflylivechat rt
GitHub stars ★ 2.6K ★ 1.2K
License Apache-2.0 GPL-2.0
Written in HTML Perl
Last push 2025-09-04 2026-09-30
Forks ⑂ 729 ⑂ 298
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick goflylivechat if

  • You weight community size — 2.6K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches HTML
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full goflylivechat profile →

pick rt if

  • You want the rt feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Perl
  • You evaluated both and rt fits your workflow better

full rt profile →

About goflylivechat

GOFLY LIVE CHAT is an open source live chat support system written in Go for self hosted customer service workloads. It belongs to the Go web application ecosystem and targets private cloud deployments where an organization runs its own messaging backend, database, and web frontend instead of relying on a hosted support platform.

read the full goflylivechat overview →

About rt

Request Tracker (RT) is an open source, enterprise grade issue and ticket tracking system written in Perl for organizations that need to track what needs to get done, who is working on which tasks, what has already been done, and when tasks were or were not completed.

read the full rt overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 58K Odoo ★ 55K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

chatwoot vs goflylivechat chatwoot vs botpress chatwoot vs glpi chatwoot vs zammad chatwoot vs chaskiq chatwoot vs frappe-helpdesk chatwoot vs deskcommcrm chatwoot vs libredesk opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip

More Customer Support & Success projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Customer Support & Success field.

goflylivechat vs Chatwoot goflylivechat vs glpi goflylivechat vs Zammad goflylivechat vs DeskcommCRM goflylivechat vs Chaskiq goflylivechat vs Frappe Helpdesk goflylivechat vs libredesk goflylivechat vs Usertour goflylivechat vs TikTokLive goflylivechat vs iTop goflylivechat vs chatwoot-mobile-app goflylivechat vs Cossistant

Frequently asked questions

Is goflylivechat or rt more popular?

goflylivechat has 2,591 GitHub stars and rt has 1,162. goflylivechat has the larger community by that measure.

Are goflylivechat and rt free?

Both are open source. goflylivechat is licensed under Apache-2.0 and rt under GPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between goflylivechat and rt?

goflylivechat is written in HTML and rt in Perl. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, goflylivechat or rt?

Choose goflylivechat if you want the larger community (2,591 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose rt if its feature set, stack or GPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.