head to head · open source

gitleaks vs workflow

gitleaks has 29,364 GitHub stars, 2,236 forks, 481 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. workflow has 2,416 stars, 361 forks, 360 open issues and last shipped yesterday. gitleaks leads on adoption by 1,115% (29,364 vs 2,416 stars). gitleaks is written in Go under MIT; workflow is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. gitleaks has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, workflow 15%. workflow was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

gitleaks ★ 29K workflow ★ 2.4K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

gitleaks workflow
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 2.4K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-09 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.2K ⑂ 361
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick gitleaks if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full gitleaks profile →

pick workflow if

  • You want the workflow feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and workflow fits your workflow better

full workflow profile →

About gitleaks

Gitleaks is an MIT licensed, Go based command line tool that detects hardcoded secrets such as passwords, API keys, and tokens in git repositories, files, and standard input, and it serves developers and security teams that need to keep credentials out of source control.

read the full gitleaks overview →

About workflow

Workflow SDK is a TypeScript and JavaScript library that makes application functions durable. It lives in the TypeScript/JavaScript ecosystem and targets server side frameworks such as Next.js. The project is intended for apps and AI agents that need to continue work across failures, waits, and restarts.

read the full workflow overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

compose vs gitleaks compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job compose vs kestra compose vs haystack compose vs rancher conductor vs xxl-job compose vs prefect uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

gitleaks vs compose gitleaks vs conductor gitleaks vs xxl-job gitleaks vs Kestra gitleaks vs haystack gitleaks vs rancher gitleaks vs Prefect gitleaks vs Archon gitleaks vs Temporal gitleaks vs rowboat gitleaks vs Trigger gitleaks vs dolphinscheduler

Frequently asked questions

Is gitleaks or workflow more popular?

gitleaks has 29,364 GitHub stars and workflow has 2,416. gitleaks has the larger community by that measure.

Are gitleaks and workflow free?

Both are open source. gitleaks is licensed under MIT and workflow under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between gitleaks and workflow?

gitleaks is written in Go and workflow in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, gitleaks or workflow?

Choose gitleaks if you want the larger community (29,364 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose workflow if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.