head to head · open source

gitleaks vs PatrowlManager

gitleaks has 29,368 GitHub stars, 2,237 forks, 481 open issues and last shipped 10 days ago. PatrowlManager has 639 stars, 111 forks, 257 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. gitleaks leads on adoption by 4,496% (29,368 vs 639 stars). gitleaks is written in Go under MIT; PatrowlManager is written in HTML under AGPL-3.0. gitleaks has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, PatrowlManager 17%. gitleaks was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

gitleaks ★ 29K PatrowlManager ★ 639 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

gitleaks PatrowlManager
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 639
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in Go HTML
Last push 2026-09-09 2026-03-10
Forks ⑂ 2.2K ⑂ 111
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick gitleaks if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full gitleaks profile →

pick PatrowlManager if

  • You want the PatrowlManager feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches HTML
  • You evaluated both and PatrowlManager fits your workflow better

full PatrowlManager profile →

About gitleaks

Gitleaks is an MIT licensed, Go based command line tool that detects hardcoded secrets such as passwords, API keys, and tokens in git repositories, files, and standard input, and it serves developers and security teams that need to keep credentials out of source control.

read the full gitleaks overview →

About PatrowlManager

PatrowlManager is the Django front end of PatrOwl, a free and open source platform for orchestrating security operations, built for security teams that need to manage assets, run scans through PatrowlEngines, aggregate the results, relay alerts to third parties, and produce reports and dashboards from one web interface and one JSON API.

read the full PatrowlManager overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

compose vs gitleaks trivy vs gitleaks n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack llama-index vs haystack compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job langgraph vs haystack n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

gitleaks vs ansible gitleaks vs compose gitleaks vs conductor gitleaks vs xxl-job gitleaks vs Kestra gitleaks vs haystack gitleaks vs rancher gitleaks vs Prefect gitleaks vs Archon gitleaks vs Temporal gitleaks vs rowboat gitleaks vs Trigger

Frequently asked questions

Is gitleaks or PatrowlManager more popular?

gitleaks has 29,368 GitHub stars and PatrowlManager has 639. gitleaks has the larger community by that measure.

Are gitleaks and PatrowlManager free?

Both are open source. gitleaks is licensed under MIT and PatrowlManager under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between gitleaks and PatrowlManager?

gitleaks is written in Go and PatrowlManager in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, gitleaks or PatrowlManager?

Choose gitleaks if you want the larger community (29,368 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose PatrowlManager if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.