head to head · open source

gitleaks vs livecontext-ce

gitleaks has 29,396 GitHub stars, 2,236 forks, 481 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. livecontext-ce has 502 stars, 59 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 12 days ago. gitleaks leads on adoption by 5,756% (29,396 vs 502 stars). gitleaks is written in Go under MIT; livecontext-ce is written in Java under AGPL-3.0. gitleaks has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, livecontext-ce 12%. gitleaks was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

gitleaks ★ 29K livecontext-ce ★ 502 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

gitleaks livecontext-ce
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 502
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in Go Java
Last push 2026-09-09 2026-09-08
Forks ⑂ 2.2K ⑂ 59
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick gitleaks if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full gitleaks profile →

pick livecontext-ce if

  • You want the livecontext-ce feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and livecontext-ce fits your workflow better

full livecontext-ce profile →

About gitleaks

Gitleaks is an MIT licensed, Go based command line tool that detects hardcoded secrets such as passwords, API keys, and tokens in git repositories, files, and standard input, and it serves developers and security teams that need to keep credentials out of source control.

read the full gitleaks overview →

About livecontext-ce

LiveContext CE is the self hosted, AGPL 3.0 Community Edition of the LiveContext AI automation platform, a single Docker deployed service where a team describes a job in chat and gets back a readable workflow, scoped AI agents and a small app the team actually uses.

read the full livecontext-ce overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

ansible vs gitleaks n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs kestra ansible vs haystack n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

gitleaks vs ansible gitleaks vs compose gitleaks vs conductor gitleaks vs xxl-job gitleaks vs Kestra gitleaks vs haystack gitleaks vs rancher gitleaks vs Prefect gitleaks vs Archon gitleaks vs Temporal gitleaks vs rowboat gitleaks vs Trigger

Frequently asked questions

Is gitleaks or livecontext-ce more popular?

gitleaks has 29,396 GitHub stars and livecontext-ce has 502. gitleaks has the larger community by that measure.

Are gitleaks and livecontext-ce free?

Both are open source. gitleaks is licensed under MIT and livecontext-ce under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between gitleaks and livecontext-ce?

gitleaks is written in Go and livecontext-ce in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, gitleaks or livecontext-ce?

Choose gitleaks if you want the larger community (29,396 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose livecontext-ce if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.