head to head · open source
gitleaks vs livecontext-ce
gitleaks has 30,653 GitHub stars, 2,333 forks, 481 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. livecontext-ce has 776 stars, 73 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 28 days ago. gitleaks leads on adoption by 3,850% (30,653 vs 776 stars). gitleaks is written in Go under MIT; livecontext-ce is written in Java under a custom or non-standard licence. gitleaks has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, livecontext-ce 9%. gitleaks was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| gitleaks | livecontext-ce | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 31K | ★ 776 |
| License | MIT | Custom / other |
| Written in | Go | Java |
| Last push | 2026-10-28 | 2026-10-07 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.3K | ⑂ 73 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick gitleaks if
- You weight community size — 31K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick livecontext-ce if
- You want the livecontext-ce feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You evaluated both and livecontext-ce fits your workflow better
About gitleaks
Gitleaks [!WARNING] Gitleaks is feature complete. I'm not merging new features into Gitleaks. Future releases will be security patches only. I'm shifting my focus to Betterleaks [license]: ./LICENSE [badge license]: [go docs badge]: [go docs]: [badge build]: [build]: [go report card badge]: [go report card]: [dockerhub]: [dockerhub badge]: [gitleaks action]: [gitleaks badge]: [![GitHub Action Test][badge build]][build] [![Docker Hub][dockerhub badge]][dockerhub] [![Gitleaks Action][gitleaks badge]][gitleaks action] [![GoDoc][go docs badge]][go docs] [![GoReportCard][go report card badge]][go report card]…
read the full gitleaks overview →
About livecontext-ce
LiveContext The AI automation platform. One message in, a working automation out. Describe the job in chat and LiveContext builds it in front of you: a workflow you can read, AI agents with scoped access and budgets you control, and a small app your team actually uses. Chat, Workflow, Agent and App in one self hosted platform. No code to write, nothing to stitch together. An open source, self hosted alternative to n8n, Zapier and Make, with AI agents built in. The builder, built by chat: one message in, a working automation out. Five real scenarios, one loop. Watch it full size · Try the hosted version ⭐…
read the full livecontext-ce overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Orchestration & Scheduling projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.
Frequently asked questions
Is gitleaks or livecontext-ce more popular?
gitleaks has 30,653 GitHub stars and livecontext-ce has 776. gitleaks has the larger community by that measure.
Are gitleaks and livecontext-ce free?
Both are open source. gitleaks is licensed under MIT, and livecontext-ce has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between gitleaks and livecontext-ce?
gitleaks is written in Go and livecontext-ce in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, gitleaks or livecontext-ce?
Choose gitleaks if you want the larger community (30,653 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose livecontext-ce if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.