head to head · open source

gitleaks vs flowable-engine

gitleaks has 29,364 GitHub stars, 2,236 forks, 481 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. flowable-engine has 9,540 stars, 2,890 forks, 411 open issues and last shipped yesterday. gitleaks leads on adoption by 208% (29,364 vs 9,540 stars). gitleaks is written in Go under MIT; flowable-engine is written in Java under Apache-2.0. gitleaks has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, flowable-engine 30%. flowable-engine was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

gitleaks ★ 29K flowable-engine ★ 9.5K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

gitleaks flowable-engine
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 9.5K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Go Java
Last push 2026-09-09 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.2K ⑂ 2.9K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick gitleaks if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full gitleaks profile →

pick flowable-engine if

  • You want the flowable-engine feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and flowable-engine fits your workflow better

full flowable-engine profile →

About gitleaks

Gitleaks is an MIT licensed, Go based command line tool that detects hardcoded secrets such as passwords, API keys, and tokens in git repositories, files, and standard input, and it serves developers and security teams that need to keep credentials out of source control.

read the full gitleaks overview →

About flowable-engine

Flowable is an open source workflow and Business Process Management platform written in Java and distributed under the Apache 2.0 license. It bundles three engines in one project: a BPMN process engine, a CMMN case engine, and a DMN rule engine. The project lives in the Java ecosystem, integrates with Spring, and exposes both a Java API and a REST API for orchestrating human or system activities.

read the full flowable-engine overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

compose vs gitleaks compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job compose vs kestra compose vs haystack compose vs rancher conductor vs xxl-job compose vs prefect uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

gitleaks vs compose gitleaks vs conductor gitleaks vs xxl-job gitleaks vs Kestra gitleaks vs haystack gitleaks vs rancher gitleaks vs Prefect gitleaks vs Archon gitleaks vs Temporal gitleaks vs rowboat gitleaks vs Trigger gitleaks vs dolphinscheduler

Frequently asked questions

Is gitleaks or flowable-engine more popular?

gitleaks has 29,364 GitHub stars and flowable-engine has 9,540. gitleaks has the larger community by that measure.

Are gitleaks and flowable-engine free?

Both are open source. gitleaks is licensed under MIT and flowable-engine under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between gitleaks and flowable-engine?

gitleaks is written in Go and flowable-engine in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, gitleaks or flowable-engine?

Choose gitleaks if you want the larger community (29,364 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose flowable-engine if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.