head to head · open source

archify vs gitdiagram

archify has 75,128 GitHub stars, 5,048 forks, 134 open issues and last shipped yesterday. gitdiagram has 17,596 stars, 1,346 forks, 43 open issues and last shipped yesterday. archify leads on adoption by 327% (75,128 vs 17,596 stars). archify is written in JavaScript under MIT; gitdiagram is written in TypeScript under MIT. archify has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, gitdiagram 8%. archify was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (architecture-diagram, code-visualization, developer-tools), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

archify ★ 75K gitdiagram ★ 18K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

archify gitdiagram
GitHub stars ★ 75K ★ 18K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-30 2026-09-30
Forks ⑂ 5.0K ⑂ 1.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick archify if

  • You weight community size — 75K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full archify profile →

pick gitdiagram if

  • You want the gitdiagram feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and gitdiagram fits your workflow better

full gitdiagram profile →

About archify

Archify is an MIT licensed agent skill and Node.js rendering and validation system that turns a codebase or a written system description into a polished, interactive, self contained HTML system map, and it is built for developers and platform teams working inside coding agents such as Cursor, Claude Code, Codex CLI, and OpenCode.

read the full archify overview →

About gitdiagram

GitDiagram is an open source, MIT licensed TypeScript tool that turns any public or private GitHub repository into an interactive architecture diagram — and now into a one minute narrated explainer video — for developers, reviewers and AI agents who need to understand a codebase quickly.

read the full gitdiagram overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 270K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 211K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 111K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

archify vs ECC archify vs react archify vs Langflow archify vs Supabase archify vs puppeteer archify vs PocketBase archify vs i-have-adhd archify vs codebase-memory-mcp archify vs herdr archify vs ToolJet archify vs AppSmith archify vs it-tools

Frequently asked questions

Is archify or gitdiagram more popular?

archify has 75,128 GitHub stars and gitdiagram has 17,596. archify has the larger community by that measure.

Are archify and gitdiagram free?

Both are open source. archify is licensed under MIT and gitdiagram under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between archify and gitdiagram?

archify is written in JavaScript and gitdiagram in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, archify or gitdiagram?

Choose archify if you want the larger community (75,128 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose gitdiagram if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.