head to head · open source

floci vs robusta

floci has 24,751 GitHub stars, 2,682 forks, 130 open issues and last shipped yesterday. robusta has 3,099 stars, 325 forks, 204 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. floci leads on adoption by 699% (24,751 vs 3,099 stars). floci is written in Java under MIT; robusta is written in Python under MIT. floci has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, robusta 10%. floci was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (devops, docker), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

floci ★ 25K robusta ★ 3.1K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

floci robusta
GitHub stars ★ 25K ★ 3.1K
License MIT MIT
Written in Java Python
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 2.7K ⑂ 325
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick floci if

  • You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full floci profile →

pick robusta if

  • You want the robusta feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and robusta fits your workflow better

full robusta profile →

About floci

Floci is a free, MIT licensed, open source local AWS emulator that gives developers, testers, and CI pipelines AWS shaped services on their own machine without a cloud account, an auth token, or paid feature gates.

read the full floci overview →

About robusta

Robusta is an open source alerting and monitoring project for Kubernetes, written in Python and released under the MIT license. The repository contains Robusta Classic, a rule based alert enrichment engine that connects to Prometheus through a webhook and adds operational context to alerts. It lives in the Kubernetes monitoring ecosystem and is compatible with kube prometheus stack, Prometheus Operator, and other Prometheus based setups.

read the full robusta overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

kubernetes vs floci kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.

floci vs kubernetes floci vs Docker floci vs kong floci vs portainer floci vs trivy floci vs OpenTofu floci vs jenkins floci vs Pulumi floci vs argo-cd floci vs sops floci vs wtf floci vs dagger

Frequently asked questions

Is floci or robusta more popular?

floci has 24,751 GitHub stars and robusta has 3,099. floci has the larger community by that measure.

Are floci and robusta free?

Both are open source. floci is licensed under MIT and robusta under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between floci and robusta?

floci is written in Java and robusta in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, floci or robusta?

Choose floci if you want the larger community (24,751 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose robusta if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.