head to head · open source

floci vs OpenStack

floci has 24,500 GitHub stars, 2,645 forks, 130 open issues and last shipped yesterday. OpenStack has 6,034 stars, 1,625 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped yesterday. floci leads on adoption by 306% (24,500 vs 6,034 stars). floci is written in Java under MIT; OpenStack is written in Python under Apache-2.0. floci has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, OpenStack 27%. OpenStack was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

floci ★ 25K OpenStack ★ 6.0K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

floci OpenStack
GitHub stars ★ 25K ★ 6.0K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Java Python
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.6K ⑂ 1.6K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick floci if

  • You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full floci profile →

pick OpenStack if

  • You want the OpenStack feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and OpenStack fits your workflow better

full OpenStack profile →

About floci

Floci is a free, MIT licensed, open source local AWS emulator that gives developers, testers, and CI pipelines AWS shaped services on their own machine without a cloud account, an auth token, or paid feature gates.

read the full floci overview →

About OpenStack

OpenStack is a collection of interoperable components that can be deployed together to provide computing, networking and storage resources. Those infrastructure resources are then exposed to end users through programmable APIs, so that capacity can be requested and managed by software rather than by hand. The project lives in the Python ecosystem and is released under the Apache 2.0 license, with development coordinated at opendev.org and documentation hosted at openstack.org.

read the full OpenStack overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

kong vs floci kong vs trivy kong vs opentofu kong vs jenkins kong vs pulumi kong vs argo-cd trivy vs opentofu kong vs sops uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.

floci vs kong floci vs trivy floci vs OpenTofu floci vs jenkins floci vs Pulumi floci vs argo-cd floci vs sops floci vs wtf floci vs dagger floci vs task floci vs aws-cdk floci vs infracost

Frequently asked questions

Is floci or OpenStack more popular?

floci has 24,500 GitHub stars and OpenStack has 6,034. floci has the larger community by that measure.

Are floci and OpenStack free?

Both are open source. floci is licensed under MIT and OpenStack under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between floci and OpenStack?

floci is written in Java and OpenStack in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, floci or OpenStack?

Choose floci if you want the larger community (24,500 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose OpenStack if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.