head to head · open source

ccpm vs Fizzy

ccpm has 8,379 GitHub stars, 836 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. Fizzy has 8,212 stars, 1,194 forks, 67 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ccpm leads on adoption by 2% (8,379 vs 8,212 stars). ccpm is written in Shell under MIT; Fizzy is written in Ruby under a custom or non-standard licence. ccpm has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, Fizzy 15%. Fizzy was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ccpm ★ 8.4K Fizzy ★ 8.2K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ccpm Fizzy
GitHub stars ★ 8.4K ★ 8.2K
License MIT Custom / other
Written in Shell Ruby
Last push 2026-03-18 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 836 ⑂ 1.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ccpm if

  • You weight community size — 8.4K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Shell
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ccpm profile →

pick Fizzy if

  • You want the Fizzy feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Ruby
  • You evaluated both and Fizzy fits your workflow better

full Fizzy profile →

About ccpm

CCPM is a project management skill system for AI coding agents that turns ideas into PRDs, PRDs into epics, epics into GitHub issues, and issues into production code via parallel agents running in Git worktrees, aimed at developers and teams doing agent assisted development on GitHub.

read the full ccpm overview →

About Fizzy

Fizzy is an open source kanban tool for tracking issues and ideas, published by 37signals as a Ruby on Rails application, and it is aimed at teams that want a fast, simple board together with the source code and the option to run that board on their own server.

read the full Fizzy overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip odoo vs erpnext odoo vs grocy odoo vs greaterwms odoo vs shelf odoo vs ralph odoo vs part-db-server odoo vs open-mercato odoo vs steedos-platform

More Project & Work Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Project & Work Management field.

ccpm vs vibe-kanban ccpm vs Wekan ccpm vs qinglong ccpm vs edict ccpm vs OpenProject ccpm vs onedev ccpm vs Planka ccpm vs Leantime ccpm vs kanboard ccpm vs Kaneo ccpm vs Backlog.md ccpm vs taskwarrior

Frequently asked questions

Is ccpm or Fizzy more popular?

ccpm has 8,379 GitHub stars and Fizzy has 8,212. ccpm has the larger community by that measure.

Are ccpm and Fizzy free?

Both are open source. ccpm is licensed under MIT, and Fizzy has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between ccpm and Fizzy?

ccpm is written in Shell and Fizzy in Ruby. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ccpm or Fizzy?

Choose ccpm if you want the larger community (8,379 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Fizzy if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.