head to head · open source

Fizzy vs agentrq

Fizzy has 8,212 GitHub stars, 1,194 forks, 67 open issues and last shipped yesterday. agentrq has 1,123 stars, 80 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped today. Fizzy leads on adoption by 631% (8,212 vs 1,123 stars). Fizzy is written in Ruby under a custom or non-standard licence; agentrq is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Fizzy has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, agentrq 7%. agentrq was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Fizzy ★ 8.2K agentrq ★ 1.1K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Fizzy agentrq
GitHub stars ★ 8.2K ★ 1.1K
License Custom / other Apache-2.0
Written in Ruby Go
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 1.2K ⑂ 80
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Fizzy if

  • You weight community size — 8.2K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Ruby
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Fizzy profile →

pick agentrq if

  • You want the agentrq feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and agentrq fits your workflow better

full agentrq profile →

About Fizzy

Fizzy is an open source kanban tool for tracking issues and ideas, published by 37signals as a Ruby on Rails application, and it is aimed at teams that want a fast, simple board together with the source code and the option to run that board on their own server.

read the full Fizzy overview →

About agentrq

AgentRQ is a self hosted, Apache 2.0 human in the loop task manager that gives human operators and AI agents one shared workspace over the Model Context Protocol, aimed at people who run their own Claude subscriptions or any agent harness with ACP support.

read the full agentrq overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip odoo vs erpnext odoo vs grocy odoo vs greaterwms odoo vs shelf odoo vs ralph odoo vs part-db-server odoo vs open-mercato odoo vs steedos-platform

More Project & Work Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Project & Work Management field.

Fizzy vs vibe-kanban Fizzy vs Wekan Fizzy vs qinglong Fizzy vs edict Fizzy vs OpenProject Fizzy vs onedev Fizzy vs Planka Fizzy vs Leantime Fizzy vs kanboard Fizzy vs Kaneo Fizzy vs ccpm Fizzy vs Backlog.md

Frequently asked questions

Is Fizzy or agentrq more popular?

Fizzy has 8,212 GitHub stars and agentrq has 1,123. Fizzy has the larger community by that measure.

Are Fizzy and agentrq free?

Both are open source. Fizzy has no licence declared in this registry, and agentrq is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Fizzy and agentrq?

Fizzy is written in Ruby and agentrq in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Fizzy or agentrq?

Choose Fizzy if you want the larger community (8,212 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose agentrq if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.