head to head · open source

Kaneo vs Fizzy

Kaneo has 9,134 GitHub stars, 800 forks, 70 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Fizzy has 8,212 stars, 1,194 forks, 67 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Kaneo leads on adoption by 11% (9,134 vs 8,212 stars). Kaneo is written in TypeScript under MIT; Fizzy is written in Ruby under a custom or non-standard licence. Kaneo has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Fizzy 15%. Kaneo was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (kanban), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Kaneo ★ 9.1K Fizzy ★ 8.2K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Kaneo Fizzy
GitHub stars ★ 9.1K ★ 8.2K
License MIT Custom / other
Written in TypeScript Ruby
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 800 ⑂ 1.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Kaneo if

  • You weight community size — 9.1K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Kaneo profile →

pick Fizzy if

  • You want the Fizzy feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Ruby
  • You evaluated both and Fizzy fits your workflow better

full Fizzy profile →

About Kaneo

Kaneo is an open source project management tool for development teams, published under the MIT license and written in TypeScript. It describes itself as "all you need, nothing you don't," and its README frames the design goal around restraint: the project's authors argue that the problem with most project management platforms is not a lack of features but an excess of them, where notifications, unnecessary buttons and complex workflows pull teams away from building products. Kaneo belongs to the self hosted project and work management ecosystem, and its topic list places it explicitly alongside issue trackers and…

read the full Kaneo overview →

About Fizzy

Fizzy is an open source kanban tool for tracking issues and ideas, published by 37signals as a Ruby on Rails application, and it is aimed at teams that want a fast, simple board together with the source code and the option to run that board on their own server.

read the full Fizzy overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip odoo vs erpnext odoo vs grocy odoo vs greaterwms odoo vs shelf odoo vs ralph odoo vs part-db-server odoo vs open-mercato odoo vs steedos-platform

More Project & Work Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Project & Work Management field.

Kaneo vs vibe-kanban Kaneo vs Wekan Kaneo vs qinglong Kaneo vs edict Kaneo vs OpenProject Kaneo vs onedev Kaneo vs Planka Kaneo vs Leantime Kaneo vs kanboard Kaneo vs ccpm Kaneo vs Backlog.md Kaneo vs taskwarrior

Frequently asked questions

Is Kaneo or Fizzy more popular?

Kaneo has 9,134 GitHub stars and Fizzy has 8,212. Kaneo has the larger community by that measure.

Are Kaneo and Fizzy free?

Both are open source. Kaneo is licensed under MIT, and Fizzy has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Kaneo and Fizzy?

Kaneo is written in TypeScript and Fizzy in Ruby. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Kaneo or Fizzy?

Choose Kaneo if you want the larger community (9,134 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Fizzy if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.