head to head · open source

webtorrent vs fingerprintjs

webtorrent has 31,397 GitHub stars, 2,902 forks, 83 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. fingerprintjs has 28,466 stars, 2,621 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped yesterday. webtorrent leads on adoption by 10% (31,397 vs 28,466 stars). webtorrent is written in JavaScript under MIT; fingerprintjs is written in TypeScript under MIT. webtorrent has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, fingerprintjs 9%. fingerprintjs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (browser, javascript), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

webtorrent ★ 31K fingerprintjs ★ 28K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

webtorrent fingerprintjs
GitHub stars ★ 31K ★ 28K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-15 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 2.6K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick webtorrent if

  • You weight community size — 31K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full webtorrent profile →

pick fingerprintjs if

  • You want the fingerprintjs feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and fingerprintjs fits your workflow better

full fingerprintjs profile →

About webtorrent

WebTorrent is a streaming torrent client written entirely in JavaScript, distributed as a single npm package that runs both in node.js and in the browser. In node.js it behaves as an ordinary torrent client, using TCP and UDP to communicate with other clients. In the browser it uses WebRTC data channels for peer to peer transport, which means it works without browser plugins, extensions, or installations. The project lives in the JavaScript and node.js ecosystem, is licensed under MIT, and has been developed for roughly thirteen years.

read the full webtorrent overview →

About fingerprintjs

FingerprintJS is an open source, client side browser fingerprinting library that queries browser attributes and computes a hashed visitor identifier from them, aimed at web developers and engineering teams that need to recognise returning browsers without depending on cookies or local storage.

read the full fingerprintjs overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

ublock vs ladybird ublock vs chrome-devtools-mcp ladybird vs chrome-devtools-mcp ublock vs monaco-editor ladybird vs monaco-editor ublock vs zen-browser ladybird vs zen-browser ublock vs servo n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Browsers & Extensions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.

webtorrent vs uBlock webtorrent vs Ladybird webtorrent vs chrome-devtools-mcp webtorrent vs monaco-editor webtorrent vs Zen Browser webtorrent vs servo webtorrent vs serenity webtorrent vs refined-github webtorrent vs slate webtorrent vs Avalonia webtorrent vs obscura webtorrent vs quasar

Frequently asked questions

Is webtorrent or fingerprintjs more popular?

webtorrent has 31,397 GitHub stars and fingerprintjs has 28,466. webtorrent has the larger community by that measure.

Are webtorrent and fingerprintjs free?

Both are open source. webtorrent is licensed under MIT and fingerprintjs under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between webtorrent and fingerprintjs?

webtorrent is written in JavaScript and fingerprintjs in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, webtorrent or fingerprintjs?

Choose webtorrent if you want the larger community (31,397 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose fingerprintjs if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.