head to head · open source

webtorrent vs quasar

webtorrent has 31,397 GitHub stars, 2,902 forks, 83 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. quasar has 27,210 stars, 3,674 forks, 74 open issues and last shipped yesterday. webtorrent leads on adoption by 15% (31,397 vs 27,210 stars). webtorrent is written in JavaScript under MIT; quasar is written in JavaScript under MIT. webtorrent has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, quasar 14%. quasar was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (javascript), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

webtorrent ★ 31K quasar ★ 27K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

webtorrent quasar
GitHub stars ★ 31K ★ 27K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-15 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 3.7K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick webtorrent if

  • You weight community size — 31K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full webtorrent profile →

pick quasar if

  • You want the quasar feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and quasar fits your workflow better

full quasar profile →

About webtorrent

WebTorrent is a streaming torrent client written entirely in JavaScript, distributed as a single npm package that runs both in node.js and in the browser. In node.js it behaves as an ordinary torrent client, using TCP and UDP to communicate with other clients. In the browser it uses WebRTC data channels for peer to peer transport, which means it works without browser plugins, extensions, or installations. The project lives in the JavaScript and node.js ecosystem, is licensed under MIT, and has been developed for roughly thirteen years.

read the full webtorrent overview →

About quasar

Quasar Framework is an MIT licensed Vue.js framework that builds responsive single page apps, server side rendered and statically generated sites, progressive web apps, browser extensions, hybrid mobile apps, and Electron desktop apps from a single codebase.

read the full quasar overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

ublock vs ladybird ublock vs chrome-devtools-mcp ladybird vs chrome-devtools-mcp ublock vs monaco-editor ladybird vs monaco-editor ublock vs zen-browser ladybird vs zen-browser ublock vs servo n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Browsers & Extensions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.

webtorrent vs uBlock webtorrent vs Ladybird webtorrent vs chrome-devtools-mcp webtorrent vs monaco-editor webtorrent vs Zen Browser webtorrent vs servo webtorrent vs serenity webtorrent vs refined-github webtorrent vs slate webtorrent vs Avalonia webtorrent vs fingerprintjs webtorrent vs obscura

Frequently asked questions

Is webtorrent or quasar more popular?

webtorrent has 31,397 GitHub stars and quasar has 27,210. webtorrent has the larger community by that measure.

Are webtorrent and quasar free?

Both are open source. webtorrent is licensed under MIT and quasar under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between webtorrent and quasar?

webtorrent is written in JavaScript and quasar in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, webtorrent or quasar?

Choose webtorrent if you want the larger community (31,397 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose quasar if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.