head to head · open source
fingerprintjs vs feathers
fingerprintjs has 28,466 GitHub stars, 2,621 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped yesterday. feathers has 15,263 stars, 798 forks, 121 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. fingerprintjs leads on adoption by 87% (28,466 vs 15,263 stars). fingerprintjs is written in TypeScript under MIT; feathers is written in TypeScript under MIT. fingerprintjs has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, feathers 5%. fingerprintjs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (browser, javascript), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| fingerprintjs | feathers | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 28K | ★ 15K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-11 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.6K | ⑂ 798 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick fingerprintjs if
- You weight community size — 28K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick feathers if
- You want the feathers feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and feathers fits your workflow better
About fingerprintjs
FingerprintJS is an open source, client side browser fingerprinting library that queries browser attributes and computes a hashed visitor identifier from them, aimed at web developers and engineering teams that need to recognise returning browsers without depending on cookies or local storage.
read the full fingerprintjs overview →
About feathers
Feathers is a full stack framework for creating web APIs and real time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. It lives in the Node.js and npm ecosystem, and it is published as a set of packages, with the core available as @feathersjs/feathers . The project has existed for roughly 15 years and is maintained under the MIT license by its contributors.
read the full feathers overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is fingerprintjs or feathers more popular?
fingerprintjs has 28,466 GitHub stars and feathers has 15,263. fingerprintjs has the larger community by that measure.
Are fingerprintjs and feathers free?
Both are open source. fingerprintjs is licensed under MIT and feathers under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between fingerprintjs and feathers?
fingerprintjs is written in TypeScript and feathers in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, fingerprintjs or feathers?
Choose fingerprintjs if you want the larger community (28,466 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose feathers if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.