head to head · open source

fingerprintjs vs Brave

fingerprintjs has 28,466 GitHub stars, 2,621 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Brave has 23,659 stars, 3,214 forks, 10,752 open issues and last shipped yesterday. fingerprintjs leads on adoption by 20% (28,466 vs 23,659 stars). fingerprintjs is written in TypeScript under MIT; Brave is written in various languages under MPL-2.0. fingerprintjs has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Brave 14%. Brave was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

fingerprintjs ★ 28K Brave ★ 24K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

fingerprintjs Brave
GitHub stars ★ 28K ★ 24K
License MIT MPL-2.0
Written in TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.6K ⑂ 3.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick fingerprintjs if

  • You weight community size — 28K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full fingerprintjs profile →

pick Brave if

  • You want the Brave feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MPL-2.0 license terms
  • You evaluated both and Brave fits your workflow better

full Brave profile →

About fingerprintjs

FingerprintJS is an open source, client side browser fingerprinting library that queries browser attributes and computes a hashed visitor identifier from them, aimed at web developers and engineering teams that need to recognise returning browsers without depending on cookies or local storage.

read the full fingerprintjs overview →

About Brave

Brave is a Chromium based web browser for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and iOS, released under the MPL 2.0 licence, and this repository is the project's public issue tracker, release channel, and developer wiki rather than the home of its source code.

read the full Brave overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

ublock vs ladybird ublock vs chrome-devtools-mcp ladybird vs chrome-devtools-mcp ublock vs monaco-editor ladybird vs monaco-editor ublock vs zen-browser ladybird vs zen-browser ublock vs servo n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Browsers & Extensions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.

fingerprintjs vs uBlock fingerprintjs vs Ladybird fingerprintjs vs chrome-devtools-mcp fingerprintjs vs monaco-editor fingerprintjs vs Zen Browser fingerprintjs vs servo fingerprintjs vs serenity fingerprintjs vs refined-github fingerprintjs vs slate fingerprintjs vs Avalonia fingerprintjs vs webtorrent fingerprintjs vs obscura

Frequently asked questions

Is fingerprintjs or Brave more popular?

fingerprintjs has 28,466 GitHub stars and Brave has 23,659. fingerprintjs has the larger community by that measure.

Are fingerprintjs and Brave free?

Both are open source. fingerprintjs is licensed under MIT and Brave under MPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between fingerprintjs and Brave?

fingerprintjs is written in TypeScript and Brave in various languages. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, fingerprintjs or Brave?

Choose fingerprintjs if you want the larger community (28,466 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Brave if its feature set, stack or MPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.