head to head · open source

filament vs wondercms

filament has 32,075 GitHub stars, 4,208 forks, 26 open issues and last shipped yesterday. wondercms has 740 stars, 168 forks, 16 open issues and last shipped 24 days ago. filament leads on adoption by 4,234% (32,075 vs 740 stars). filament is written in PHP under MIT; wondercms is written in PHP under MIT. filament has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, wondercms 23%. filament was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (cms), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

filament ★ 32K wondercms ★ 740 category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

filament wondercms
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 740
License MIT MIT
Written in PHP PHP
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-08-25
Forks ⑂ 4.2K ⑂ 168
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick filament if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full filament profile →

pick wondercms if

  • You want the wondercms feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You evaluated both and wondercms fits your workflow better

full wondercms profile →

About filament

Filament is a free, MIT licensed UI framework for Laravel, built on Livewire, that gives PHP developers a cohesive set of components for building applications and admin panels quickly.

read the full filament overview →

About wondercms

WonderCMS is a flat file content management system written in PHP and distributed under the MIT license. It is presented as a five file project, approximately 50KB when zipped, and it stores site data in a JSON database instead of a conventional external database server. The project lives in the content management system ecosystem, specifically the flat file CMS niche, and its topics include blogs, landing pages, lightweight sites, and content management.

read the full wondercms overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

hugo vs filament hugo vs strapi hugo vs payload hugo vs halo strapi vs payload strapi vs halo hugo vs wagtail hugo vs decap-cms next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki

More Content Management Systems (CMS) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Content Management Systems (CMS) field.

filament vs hugo filament vs Strapi filament vs Payload filament vs halo filament vs wagtail filament vs decap-cms filament vs TinaCMS filament vs frappe filament vs Instatic filament vs OrchardCore filament vs Publii filament vs sanity

Frequently asked questions

Is filament or wondercms more popular?

filament has 32,075 GitHub stars and wondercms has 740. filament has the larger community by that measure.

Are filament and wondercms free?

Both are open source. filament is licensed under MIT and wondercms under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between filament and wondercms?

filament is written in PHP and wondercms in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, filament or wondercms?

Choose filament if you want the larger community (32,075 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose wondercms if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.