head to head · open source
filament vs studiocms
filament has 32,397 GitHub stars, 4,237 forks, 26 open issues and last shipped yesterday. studiocms has 841 stars, 60 forks, 20 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. filament leads on adoption by 3,752% (32,397 vs 841 stars). filament is written in PHP under MIT; studiocms is written in TypeScript under MIT. filament has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, studiocms 7%. filament was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (cms), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| filament | studiocms | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 841 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | PHP | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.2K | ⑂ 60 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick filament if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches PHP
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick studiocms if
- You want the studiocms feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and studiocms fits your workflow better
About filament
Build apps & admin panels fast, for your bright ideas. With a solid Laravel foundation and a polished UI, you can focus on what makes your product unique. Filament gives you UI components that you won't outgrow — a cohesive set of well considered building blocks that adapt as your application grows in complexity. Tables — Browse and filter large datasets with powerful columns, actions, and bulk operations. Forms — Build complex, reactive forms using a set of reusable, state aware components. Infolists — Render read only record views with structured layouts and custom formatting. Notifications — Trigger in app…
read the full filament overview →
About studiocms
StudioCMS StudioCMS is an SSR Headless CMS built for the Astro Ecosystem. To see how to get started with StudioCMS, check out the StudioCMS Docs. Packages in this repository Astro Integrations StudioCMS Plugins Tools and Utilities Getting Started with our Development Playground The StudioCMS Playground is intended for usage when developing StudioCMS within the monorepo and should not be used to directly test or host StudioCMS. If your goal is to test our CMS, please use our latest release from npm. Steps to get a running playground should be the following: Clone the GitHub repository Run pnpm i frozen lockfile…
read the full studiocms overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Content Management Systems (CMS) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Content Management Systems (CMS) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is filament or studiocms more popular?
filament has 32,397 GitHub stars and studiocms has 841. filament has the larger community by that measure.
Are filament and studiocms free?
Both are open source. filament is licensed under MIT and studiocms under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between filament and studiocms?
filament is written in PHP and studiocms in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, filament or studiocms?
Choose filament if you want the larger community (32,397 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose studiocms if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.