head to head · open source

filament vs studiocms

filament has 32,075 GitHub stars, 4,208 forks, 26 open issues and last shipped yesterday. studiocms has 833 stars, 59 forks, 20 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. filament leads on adoption by 3,751% (32,075 vs 833 stars). filament is written in PHP under MIT; studiocms is written in TypeScript under MIT. filament has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, studiocms 7%. filament was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (cms), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

filament ★ 32K studiocms ★ 833 category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

filament studiocms
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 833
License MIT MIT
Written in PHP TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 4.2K ⑂ 59
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick filament if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full filament profile →

pick studiocms if

  • You want the studiocms feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and studiocms fits your workflow better

full studiocms profile →

About filament

Filament is a free, MIT licensed UI framework for Laravel, built on Livewire, that gives PHP developers a cohesive set of components for building applications and admin panels quickly.

read the full filament overview →

About studiocms

StudioCMS is an SSR (server side rendered) headless content management system built natively for the Astro ecosystem, aimed at Astro developers and teams who want to author and manage content for a server rendered Astro site without leaving Astro's own tooling.

read the full studiocms overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

hugo vs filament hugo vs strapi hugo vs payload hugo vs halo strapi vs payload strapi vs halo hugo vs wagtail hugo vs decap-cms next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki

More Content Management Systems (CMS) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Content Management Systems (CMS) field.

filament vs hugo filament vs Strapi filament vs Payload filament vs halo filament vs wagtail filament vs decap-cms filament vs TinaCMS filament vs frappe filament vs Instatic filament vs OrchardCore filament vs Publii filament vs sanity

Frequently asked questions

Is filament or studiocms more popular?

filament has 32,075 GitHub stars and studiocms has 833. filament has the larger community by that measure.

Are filament and studiocms free?

Both are open source. filament is licensed under MIT and studiocms under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between filament and studiocms?

filament is written in PHP and studiocms in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, filament or studiocms?

Choose filament if you want the larger community (32,075 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose studiocms if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.