head to head · open source
filament vs strapi-tool-dockerize
filament has 32,397 GitHub stars, 4,237 forks, 26 open issues and last shipped yesterday. strapi-tool-dockerize has 622 stars, 37 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. filament leads on adoption by 5,109% (32,397 vs 622 stars). filament is written in PHP under MIT; strapi-tool-dockerize is written in JavaScript under MIT. filament has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, strapi-tool-dockerize 6%. filament was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| filament | strapi-tool-dockerize | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 622 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | PHP | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-07-09 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.2K | ⑂ 37 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick filament if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches PHP
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick strapi-tool-dockerize if
- You want the strapi-tool-dockerize feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and strapi-tool-dockerize fits your workflow better
About filament
Build apps & admin panels fast, for your bright ideas. With a solid Laravel foundation and a polished UI, you can focus on what makes your product unique. Filament gives you UI components that you won't outgrow — a cohesive set of well considered building blocks that adapt as your application grows in complexity. Tables — Browse and filter large datasets with powerful columns, actions, and bulk operations. Forms — Build complex, reactive forms using a set of reusable, state aware components. Infolists — Render read only record views with structured layouts and custom formatting. Notifications — Trigger in app…
read the full filament overview →
About strapi-tool-dockerize
@Strapi community/dockerize Add docker support for a Strapi Project with ease 🚀 Feel free to buy @Eventyret a ☕️ if this tool was helpful Open Collective Table of Contents 🚦 Current Status ✨ Usage 🤖 Using CLI Arguments 🧹 Resetting project 🚀 Features 🐳 Docker compose support 🎗 Contributing ⭐️ Show your support 🔗 Links 🌎 Community support 🙋♀️ Authors 🙋♂️ Contributors (Thank you 🙏) 🔖 License 🚦 Current Status This package is currently under development and should be consider STABLE in terms of state. I/We are currently accepting contributions and/or dedicated contributors to help develop and maintain…
read the full strapi-tool-dockerize overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Content Management Systems (CMS) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Content Management Systems (CMS) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is filament or strapi-tool-dockerize more popular?
filament has 32,397 GitHub stars and strapi-tool-dockerize has 622. filament has the larger community by that measure.
Are filament and strapi-tool-dockerize free?
Both are open source. filament is licensed under MIT and strapi-tool-dockerize under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between filament and strapi-tool-dockerize?
filament is written in PHP and strapi-tool-dockerize in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, filament or strapi-tool-dockerize?
Choose filament if you want the larger community (32,397 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose strapi-tool-dockerize if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.