head to head · open source

filament vs squidex

filament has 32,075 GitHub stars, 4,208 forks, 26 open issues and last shipped yesterday. squidex has 2,509 stars, 522 forks, 5 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. filament leads on adoption by 1,178% (32,075 vs 2,509 stars). filament is written in PHP under MIT; squidex is written in C# under MIT. filament has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, squidex 21%. filament was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (cms), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

filament ★ 32K squidex ★ 2.5K category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

filament squidex
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 2.5K
License MIT MIT
Written in PHP C#
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 4.2K ⑂ 522
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick filament if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full filament profile →

pick squidex if

  • You want the squidex feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and squidex fits your workflow better

full squidex profile →

About filament

Filament is a free, MIT licensed UI framework for Laravel, built on Livewire, that gives PHP developers a cohesive set of components for building applications and admin panels quickly.

read the full filament overview →

About squidex

Squidex is an open source headless CMS and content management hub built in C on ASP.NET Core under the MIT licence, for development teams that model content in a backend service and build their own website, native app, or downstream server on top of its API.

read the full squidex overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

hugo vs filament hugo vs strapi hugo vs payload hugo vs halo strapi vs payload strapi vs halo hugo vs wagtail hugo vs decap-cms next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki

More Content Management Systems (CMS) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Content Management Systems (CMS) field.

filament vs hugo filament vs Strapi filament vs Payload filament vs halo filament vs wagtail filament vs decap-cms filament vs TinaCMS filament vs frappe filament vs Instatic filament vs OrchardCore filament vs Publii filament vs sanity

Frequently asked questions

Is filament or squidex more popular?

filament has 32,075 GitHub stars and squidex has 2,509. filament has the larger community by that measure.

Are filament and squidex free?

Both are open source. filament is licensed under MIT and squidex under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between filament and squidex?

filament is written in PHP and squidex in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, filament or squidex?

Choose filament if you want the larger community (32,075 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose squidex if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.