head to head · open source

filament vs pagible

filament has 32,075 GitHub stars, 4,208 forks, 26 open issues and last shipped yesterday. pagible has 587 stars, 14 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped yesterday. filament leads on adoption by 5,364% (32,075 vs 587 stars). filament is written in PHP under MIT; pagible is written in PHP under MIT. filament has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, pagible 2%. pagible was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (cms, laravel), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

filament ★ 32K pagible ★ 587 category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

filament pagible
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 587
License MIT MIT
Written in PHP PHP
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 4.2K ⑂ 14
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick filament if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full filament profile →

pick pagible if

  • You want the pagible feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You evaluated both and pagible fits your workflow better

full pagible profile →

About filament

Filament is a free, MIT licensed UI framework for Laravel, built on Livewire, that gives PHP developers a cohesive set of components for building applications and admin panels quickly.

read the full filament overview →

About pagible

PagibleAI CMS is an MIT licensed, API first content management package for Laravel that installs into an existing PHP application and is aimed at Laravel teams that want WordPress like editing, Contentful style structured content, AI assistance, and multi tenant scale.

read the full pagible overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

hugo vs filament hugo vs strapi hugo vs payload hugo vs halo strapi vs payload strapi vs halo hugo vs wagtail hugo vs decap-cms next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki

More Content Management Systems (CMS) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Content Management Systems (CMS) field.

filament vs hugo filament vs Strapi filament vs Payload filament vs halo filament vs wagtail filament vs decap-cms filament vs TinaCMS filament vs frappe filament vs Instatic filament vs OrchardCore filament vs Publii filament vs sanity

Frequently asked questions

Is filament or pagible more popular?

filament has 32,075 GitHub stars and pagible has 587. filament has the larger community by that measure.

Are filament and pagible free?

Both are open source. filament is licensed under MIT and pagible under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between filament and pagible?

filament is written in PHP and pagible in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, filament or pagible?

Choose filament if you want the larger community (32,075 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose pagible if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.