head to head · open source

filament vs joomla-cms

filament has 32,075 GitHub stars, 4,208 forks, 26 open issues and last shipped yesterday. joomla-cms has 5,137 stars, 3,867 forks, 928 open issues and last shipped yesterday. filament leads on adoption by 524% (32,075 vs 5,137 stars). filament is written in PHP under MIT; joomla-cms is written in PHP under GPL-2.0. filament has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, joomla-cms 75%. joomla-cms was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (cms), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

filament ★ 32K joomla-cms ★ 5.1K category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

filament joomla-cms
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 5.1K
License MIT GPL-2.0
Written in PHP PHP
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 4.2K ⑂ 3.9K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick filament if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full filament profile →

pick joomla-cms if

  • You want the joomla-cms feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You evaluated both and joomla-cms fits your workflow better

full joomla-cms profile →

About filament

Filament is a free, MIT licensed UI framework for Laravel, built on Livewire, that gives PHP developers a cohesive set of components for building applications and admin panels quickly.

read the full filament overview →

About joomla-cms

Joomla! CMS is a free, open source content management system written in PHP that lets people build websites and online applications, and this repository is the source code home of the Joomla! 5.x line for developers, integrators, and site builders.

read the full joomla-cms overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

hugo vs filament hugo vs strapi hugo vs payload hugo vs halo strapi vs payload strapi vs halo hugo vs wagtail hugo vs decap-cms next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki

More Content Management Systems (CMS) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Content Management Systems (CMS) field.

filament vs hugo filament vs Strapi filament vs Payload filament vs halo filament vs wagtail filament vs decap-cms filament vs TinaCMS filament vs frappe filament vs Instatic filament vs OrchardCore filament vs Publii filament vs sanity

Frequently asked questions

Is filament or joomla-cms more popular?

filament has 32,075 GitHub stars and joomla-cms has 5,137. filament has the larger community by that measure.

Are filament and joomla-cms free?

Both are open source. filament is licensed under MIT and joomla-cms under GPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between filament and joomla-cms?

filament is written in PHP and joomla-cms in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, filament or joomla-cms?

Choose filament if you want the larger community (32,075 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose joomla-cms if its feature set, stack or GPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.