head to head · open source

filament vs fastschema

filament has 32,075 GitHub stars, 4,208 forks, 26 open issues and last shipped yesterday. fastschema has 573 stars, 55 forks, 32 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. filament leads on adoption by 5,498% (32,075 vs 573 stars). filament is written in PHP under MIT; fastschema is written in Go under MIT. filament has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, fastschema 10%. filament was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (cms), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

filament ★ 32K fastschema ★ 573 category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

filament fastschema
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 573
License MIT MIT
Written in PHP Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-07-11
Forks ⑂ 4.2K ⑂ 55
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick filament if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full filament profile →

pick fastschema if

  • You want the fastschema feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and fastschema fits your workflow better

full fastschema profile →

About filament

Filament is a free, MIT licensed UI framework for Laravel, built on Livewire, that gives PHP developers a cohesive set of components for building applications and admin panels quickly.

read the full filament overview →

About fastschema

FastSchema is an MIT licensed, Go based Backend as a Service and web framework that turns a declared schema into database tables and RESTful CRUD APIs, built for developers and no code teams creating headless CMS platforms and dynamic web applications.

read the full fastschema overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

hugo vs filament hugo vs strapi hugo vs payload hugo vs halo strapi vs payload strapi vs halo hugo vs wagtail hugo vs decap-cms next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki

More Content Management Systems (CMS) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Content Management Systems (CMS) field.

filament vs hugo filament vs Strapi filament vs Payload filament vs halo filament vs wagtail filament vs decap-cms filament vs TinaCMS filament vs frappe filament vs Instatic filament vs OrchardCore filament vs Publii filament vs sanity

Frequently asked questions

Is filament or fastschema more popular?

filament has 32,075 GitHub stars and fastschema has 573. filament has the larger community by that measure.

Are filament and fastschema free?

Both are open source. filament is licensed under MIT and fastschema under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between filament and fastschema?

filament is written in PHP and fastschema in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, filament or fastschema?

Choose filament if you want the larger community (32,075 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose fastschema if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.