head to head · open source

filament vs daptin

filament has 32,075 GitHub stars, 4,208 forks, 26 open issues and last shipped yesterday. daptin has 1,896 stars, 122 forks, 28 open issues and last shipped yesterday. filament leads on adoption by 1,592% (32,075 vs 1,896 stars). filament is written in PHP under MIT; daptin is written in Go under LGPL-3.0. filament has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, daptin 6%. daptin was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

filament ★ 32K daptin ★ 1.9K category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

filament daptin
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 1.9K
License MIT LGPL-3.0
Written in PHP Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 4.2K ⑂ 122
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick filament if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full filament profile →

pick daptin if

  • You want the daptin feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the LGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and daptin fits your workflow better

full daptin profile →

About filament

Filament is a free, MIT licensed UI framework for Laravel, built on Livewire, that gives PHP developers a cohesive set of components for building applications and admin panels quickly.

read the full filament overview →

About daptin

Daptin is a self hosted application server built in Go. It lives in the backend as a service and headless CMS ecosystem, and it organizes behavior around schema files that describe records, fields, relationships, validation, and optional flags. Each configured table becomes a permission aware JSON:API resource at /api/{entity}, and the server attaches identity, files, automation, integrations, realtime delivery, metering, and protocol surfaces around that runtime.

read the full daptin overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

hugo vs filament hugo vs strapi hugo vs payload hugo vs halo strapi vs payload strapi vs halo hugo vs wagtail hugo vs decap-cms next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki

More Content Management Systems (CMS) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Content Management Systems (CMS) field.

filament vs hugo filament vs Strapi filament vs Payload filament vs halo filament vs wagtail filament vs decap-cms filament vs TinaCMS filament vs frappe filament vs Instatic filament vs OrchardCore filament vs Publii filament vs sanity

Frequently asked questions

Is filament or daptin more popular?

filament has 32,075 GitHub stars and daptin has 1,896. filament has the larger community by that measure.

Are filament and daptin free?

Both are open source. filament is licensed under MIT and daptin under LGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between filament and daptin?

filament is written in PHP and daptin in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, filament or daptin?

Choose filament if you want the larger community (32,075 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose daptin if its feature set, stack or LGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.