head to head · open source
filament vs content
filament has 32,397 GitHub stars, 4,237 forks, 26 open issues and last shipped yesterday. content has 3,676 stars, 749 forks, 54 open issues and last shipped yesterday. filament leads on adoption by 781% (32,397 vs 3,676 stars). filament is written in PHP under MIT; content is written in TypeScript under MIT. filament has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, content 20%. filament was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (cms), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| filament | content | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 3.7K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | PHP | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.2K | ⑂ 749 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick filament if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches PHP
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick content if
- You want the content feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and content fits your workflow better
About filament
Build apps & admin panels fast, for your bright ideas. With a solid Laravel foundation and a polished UI, you can focus on what makes your product unique. Filament gives you UI components that you won't outgrow — a cohesive set of well considered building blocks that adapt as your application grows in complexity. Tables — Browse and filter large datasets with powerful columns, actions, and bulk operations. Forms — Build complex, reactive forms using a set of reusable, state aware components. Infolists — Render read only record views with structured layouts and custom formatting. Notifications — Trigger in app…
read the full filament overview →
About content
Nuxt Content [![npm version][npm version src]][npm version href] [![npm downloads][npm downloads src]][npm downloads href] [![License][license src]][license href] [![Nuxt][nuxt src]][nuxt href] [![Volta][volta src]][volta href] Nuxt Content reads the content/ directory in your project, parses .md , .yml , .csv or .json files and creates a powerful data layer for your application. Bonus, use Vue components in Markdown with the MDC syntax. 📖 Read the documentation ✨ Intro video ✍️ Nuxt Studio Features Nuxt 3 support Work in serverless and edge environments (Cloudflare Workers, etc.) Render Vue components in…
read the full content overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Content Management Systems (CMS) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Content Management Systems (CMS) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is filament or content more popular?
filament has 32,397 GitHub stars and content has 3,676. filament has the larger community by that measure.
Are filament and content free?
Both are open source. filament is licensed under MIT and content under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between filament and content?
filament is written in PHP and content in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, filament or content?
Choose filament if you want the larger community (32,397 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose content if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.