head to head · open source

filament vs content

filament has 32,078 GitHub stars, 4,209 forks, 26 open issues and last shipped yesterday. content has 3,665 stars, 746 forks, 54 open issues and last shipped today. filament leads on adoption by 775% (32,078 vs 3,665 stars). filament is written in PHP under MIT; content is written in TypeScript under MIT. filament has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, content 20%. content was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (cms), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

filament ★ 32K content ★ 3.7K category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

filament content
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 3.7K
License MIT MIT
Written in PHP TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 4.2K ⑂ 746
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick filament if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full filament profile →

pick content if

  • You want the content feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and content fits your workflow better

full content profile →

About filament

Filament is a free, MIT licensed UI framework for Laravel, built on Livewire, that gives PHP developers a cohesive set of components for building applications and admin panels quickly.

read the full filament overview →

About content

Nuxt Content [![npm version][npm version src]][npm version href] [![npm downloads][npm downloads src]][npm downloads href] [![License][license src]][license href] [![Nuxt][nuxt src]][nuxt href] [![Volta][volta src]][volta href] Nuxt Content reads the content/ directory in your project, parses .md , .yml , .csv or .json files and creates a powerful data layer for your application. Bonus, use Vue components in Markdown with the MDC syntax. 📖 Read the documentation ✨ Intro video ✍️ Nuxt Studio Features Nuxt 3 support Work in serverless and edge environments (Cloudflare Workers, etc.) Render Vue components in Markdo…

read the full content overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

hugo vs filament hugo vs strapi hugo vs payload hugo vs halo strapi vs payload strapi vs halo hugo vs wagtail hugo vs decap-cms next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki

More Content Management Systems (CMS) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Content Management Systems (CMS) field.

filament vs hugo filament vs Strapi filament vs Payload filament vs halo filament vs wagtail filament vs decap-cms filament vs TinaCMS filament vs frappe filament vs Instatic filament vs OrchardCore filament vs Publii filament vs sanity

Frequently asked questions

Is filament or content more popular?

filament has 32,078 GitHub stars and content has 3,665. filament has the larger community by that measure.

Are filament and content free?

Both are open source. filament is licensed under MIT and content under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between filament and content?

filament is written in PHP and content in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, filament or content?

Choose filament if you want the larger community (32,078 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose content if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.